Good reason to play 4 stringsYes. Good point. And if your b string sounds huge and fat to you on stage, it is probably a pile of mush to people in the audience.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Good reason to play 4 stringsYes. Good point. And if your b string sounds huge and fat to you on stage, it is probably a pile of mush to people in the audience.
My plan is to pair the Changeling with the H1203 for louder gigs. I'm curious (as is Steubig) about the taller cab alone and low end performance. While I sold the D800+, I still have my D800 and now a Forte so I have some different voices to work with. I also had an MAS109 so have some memory of that as well.
Not sure if Nostatic still has this combination (someone else mentioned it again recently), that being a Hathor 1203 / a ThunderChild 112.
For the longest time I lusted for a ThunderChild 212 & later a Hathor 212.
Normally I prefer a one cab solution, but that combination makes a lot of sense.
Duke, how would a Hathor 1203 work on top a ThunderChild 212?
I realize the amp would need to be 2.33 Ohm happy to work - I'm thinking of a few that are.
Duke, how would a Hathor 1203 work on top a ThunderChild 212?
I realize the amp would need to be 2.33 Ohm happy to work - I'm thinking of a few that are.
Oops! Fuzzy synapses.I don't currently have it, but steubig has a TC112 so we'll pair them at the next cabpalooza. I think they paired fine when I had them, I just am not crazy about the horn when compared to the 3" paper cone. I did have a pair of H1203s and they would peel paint of the walls, but the pair didn't reach a lot lower than a single unit.
Both the Mesa D800/+ and Forte will do 2 ohm loads. An H1203 and a TC212 would be a lot of booty, but I think the TC would get most of the watts so not sure it would make a huge difference as the 212 is pretty big sounding on its own.
lateral overhang...
I think "dope" was early '90s. Then it was "hot." Then it was "sick." Then superlatives fell out of fashion for a bit. Then it was "Sooooooo ___" with the number of O's equal to the desired emphasis, and the "____" equal to any reasonably pertinent adjective.I hear their new album is supposed to be pretty dope...
Isn’t that what the kids are saying these days? I was just getting comfortable making the transition from groovy to cool.
I think "dope" was early '90s. Then it was "hot." Then it was "sick." Then superlatives fell out of fashion for a bit. Then it was "Sooooooo ___" with the number of O's equal to the desired emphasis, and the "____" equal to any reasonably pertinent adjective.
Then I had kids and I honestly don't give a @#$% anymore because it's all and gibberish and poop jokes around here.
Everything is "lit" now, according to my grandsons.I think "dope" was early '90s. Then it was "hot." Then it was "sick." Then superlatives fell out of fashion for a bit. Then it was "Sooooooo ___" with the number of O's equal to the desired emphasis, and the "____" equal to any reasonably pertinent adjective.
Then I had kids and I honestly don't give a @#$% anymore because it's all and gibberish and poop jokes around here.
fleek
salty
live it - love it



I think "dope" was early '90s. Then it was "hot." Then it was "sick." Then superlatives fell out of fashion for a bit. Then it was "Sooooooo ___" with the number of O's equal to the desired emphasis, and the "____" equal to any reasonably pertinent adjective.
Then I had kids and I honestly don't give a @#$% anymore because it's all and gibberish and poop jokes around here.
Sweeeeeet!"Groovy" is making a comeback....you heard it here first.......