• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bands that singers ruin...

It's funny how things work out, I started this thread a couple years ago not being able to listen to a full Periphery song without fast forwarding to instrumental parts. Now I can honestly say they are my favourite bands around. There are times where Spencer's singing still makes me cringe a bit, but it's part of their sound as a whole I guess. If it was someone else now, it would be weird.

Sad note, Nolly announced he won't be touring with the band anymore.
 
How many bands can you think of where you hear the music and you get really into it, makes you want to look up tabs and start learning...

Then the singer fires up and it completely turns you off.

First of all, almost nothing on this earth could make me want to look up tabs :)

But in the spirit of the OP's question, the band that immediately comes to mind is Japan. I think musically they were the apex of 1980s techno-pop: Inventive, quirky, infectious, exotic, substantive, nuanced, finely textured and colorfully arranged, with just the right balance of idiosyncratic individualistic chops and disciplined self-control

...and then David Sylvian starts yammering and they instantly sound like every other effete, fey, affected, faux-sensetive New Romantic bandwagon-jumper with a funny haircut. Makes me want to stab myself in the eardrum with a #2 pencil.


A close second would be Steely Dan. I find a lot of their music a little bit too precious and micro-managed, but I can usually get past that since it is so skillfully arranged, performed, & produced. What I can't get past is Donald Fagen's mewling.
 
First of all, almost nothing on this earth could make me want to look up tabs :)

But in the spirit of the OP's question, the band that immediately comes to mind is Japan. I think musically they were the apex of 1980s techno-pop: Inventive, quirky, infectious, exotic, substantive, nuanced, finely textured and colorfully arranged, with just the right balance of idiosyncratic individualistic chops and disciplined self-control

...and then David Sylvian starts yammering and they instantly sound like every other effete, fey, affected, faux-sensetive New Romantic bandwagon-jumper with a funny haircut. Makes me want to stab myself in the eardrum with a #2 pencil.


A close second would be Steely Dan. I find a lot of their music a little bit too precious and micro-managed, but I can usually get past that since it is so skillfully arranged, performed, & produced. What I can't get past is Donald Fagen's mewling.

Aww, man - I loves me some Donald Fagen; but it's all good! :)
 


There are hundreds of bands with vocalist I don't particularly care for but cattle was the first that popped in my head.

There's also a lot of singers I wished were in different bands.

But for me not liking the vocals isn't an instant deal breaker. Some bands I listen to because they have a sick drummer, others a good bass player. I enjoy listening to Primus even though the vocals aren't my thing. On the other side of that really like some bands for their lyrics. For example Cold is one of my favorite rock bands. Like the lyrics, and scooter sounds good on recordings but I went to see them live and they weren't the best live band.

Hell there's a bunch of bands I like that don't even have singers; conquering dystopia, animals as leaders, if these trees could talk, mogwai
 
Nirvana. Curt Cobain made me want to punch my radio......and still does even from the grave.

He was worse at singing than he was at guitar......and that's saying something. Still, the band as a whole could rock out some music on occasion. I would literally let one of their songs play right up until he was about to vomit into a mic.