Performance agreement?
Contract?
for a $350.00 bar gig?
yeah right. Whatever you say...![]()
Yeah, right, whatever. Here in Finland that's about as much you can get if you're an semi-unknown band playing originals. For many of us the $20 you eventually end up getting per gig is important and I hope you show some respect for the bands that just don't get more. Making the contract is pretty much free so not having one is just plain stupid, no matter what the bar pays. If you can afford not getting $350 from a gig, that's fine. Of course I can too but IMO that's just stupid so I won't.
As for the original question, the big question is did the barkeeper hire A band or THE band. I'm assuming the earlier in which case it really was the band's fault - you guys should have been able to turn down, even the drummer. IMO it doesn't matter what you do, the best is of course that he learns to play quieter. Other options are rods or electric drums OR WHATEVER but if he wants to play normal drums with normal sticks he also needs to be able to play quiet. If he can't... Well, the louder he plays the less potential gig places you have.
But now before you have reached the point where you have huge posters of your band all over the town and people come see only THE band (and maybe buy a few drinks) you really should do as the "boss" aka. the barkeeper says. He's the one who's paying and you're the ones who are working for him. He says quiet, you play quiet.
