• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

"Bass is not played that way" ?!

Hey all,
so I was playing a 16th note riff on the higher frets of the G and D string, then the guitarist comes to me and says: "man, bass is not played that way". I was so upset that there was someone making rules for an instrument haha. Have you experienced this as well, that someone said, stick to the root notes or anything like that?

Cheers
Just exactly what kind of music were you playing?
 
I take great pride in writing 'non-traditional' basslines that no guitar player or even many bass players my age would ever think to do. As long as it sounds good, why even listen to the guitarist? It's not like they're part of the main driving force of the band ;)
 
Hey all,
so I was playing a 16th note riff on the higher frets of the G and D string, then the guitarist comes to me and says: "man, bass is not played that way". I was so upset that there was someone making rules for an instrument haha. Have you experienced this as well, that someone said, stick to the root notes or anything like that?

Cheers

I have strong feelings on this.

1. I learned a long time ago not to tell other people how to play their instrument. Give them the concept of what you would like them to do (ie. "can you give it more of a textured sound") rather than specific practices for how to actually make music on their instrument.

2. Don't be bound by tradition.

For me, it's what gets me making good music the fastest. Some of you know I play only short scale instruments. I have done so on electric bass for the last 30 years. Even though luthiers in the 90's told me nothing short of a full scale bass would work "because the low E of the short scale doesn't resonate enough". Fast forward 30 years and there is a plethora of short scale basses of decent quality on the market, and many cats are gigging with them. Many..!

I play with a low action on my upright bass, and I have this clicking sound on the G string. So, I have learned to change the angle of my plucking with the right hand so the string vibrates loudly, but not up and down so it hits the fingerboard -- it vibrates side to side, parallel to the fingerboard surface. Not exactly standard practice, but it works. I have other things I do on instruments, in bands, in song writing that I think people would sneer at but I don't give a hoot about it.

So much of what passes for "proper technique" is one person's opinion, built on the assumption that everyone has the same body size and goals. That's not true.

Yesterdays' bedrock principles often become only one of many styles for approaching the instrument.

Bottom line -- do what sounds good. Know what the "rules are", and if you choose to break them, have a very good reason that manifests itself in the music or an improvement of your situation as a musician!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: blue4
I've had the opposite problem. Our church band had tons of trouble finding and keeping guitarists so when I first started I was often asked to play as high as possible to kinda/sorta cover for the missing guitar! We've since found enough guitars but no one objects if I use those high frets occasionally.
 
There seems to be a lot of people out there who don't play bass that have some definite rules on how a bass is played.
They're usually those who play old school Rock 'N Roll,Blues and Punk.

Edit:
In addition to the above thought.
There are also seem to be those who will join an old school Rock 'N Roll,Blues or Punk band and for some reason think that the band will want to use advanced techniques.
You must play what's appropriate for the music type.

This.

Sometimes we forget that a band is a *band* and the music the band makes is a *band* product... not the product of a "band featuring wonderbassist". Decisions to play outside the intended style or the way its been played should be discussed as a band beforehand and not unilaterally decided upon in the middle of a performance.

Don't confuse this with the whole "bass should be played a certain way" thing (which I absolutely detest), because it's not the same. This is "if you're going to be part of a band, play as a band and not as an island unto yourself". After all, we don't want everybody to think we're wannabee guitarists, do we?

TBH there are *alot* of replies in this thread that justify other positions thinking we bassists are a strange, difficult bunch to deal with.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Watchootognbout
This.

Sometimes we forget that a band is a *band* and the music the band makes is a *band* product... not the product of a "band featuring wonderbassist". Decisions to play outside the intended style or the way its been played should be discussed as a band beforehand and not unilaterally decided upon in the middle of a performance.

Don't confuse this with the whole "bass should be played a certain way" thing (which I absolutely detest), because it's not the same. This is "if you're going to be part of a band, play as a band and not as an island unto yourself". After all, we don't want everybody to think we're wannabee guitarists, do we?
Never bothered me. I play guitar, too, and could play out on it if I wanted (and got a little more in practice with it).

TBH there are *alot* of replies in this thread that justify other positions thinking we bassists are a strange, difficult bunch to deal with.
100% true.
 
Bass is played any way that it works for that song.
Don't you think it should be played the way that the one who wrote the song meant it to be played?
Or does the listener/bassist/guitarist have the right to say that the writers judgement on his own song is flawed?
Who has the right to determine that?
For example:Some may say that the bassline to this piece is too busy.

But just who decides what is the right bass line?
The writer and the bass player that submitted the bass line.
 
Last edited:
Don't you think it should be played the way that the one who wrote the song meant it to be played?
Or does the listener/bassist/guitarist have the right to say that the writers judgement on his own song is flawed?
Who has the right to determine that?
For example:Some may say that the bassline to this piece is too busy.

But just who decides what is the right bass line?
The writer and the bass player that submitted the bass line.


I'm a "play it as originally performed" kinda guy, but don't think that's necessarily the "right" way or only way to do it for everyone. It's just right for me.

That being said, I don't think the issue here is that songs are or aren't being played the they were originally performed, although this idea has gotten mixed into the discussion and produced some very cringey replies.

The issue is, if you're going to be in a band you should be acting as part of that band as opposed to being a self-indulgent jerk. In other words, the band decides together how the songs are played. When a bassist decides on his own to play it his way, it's like a McDonald's franchisee deciding to serve Whoppers instead of Big Macs because that's what *he* wants to serve regardless of his commitment to McDonald's and his customers.

And if you can't handle being in a band that wants to do things a certain way, whatever way that is, then don't be in that band.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Watchootognbout
Don't you think it should be played the way that the one who wrote the song meant it to be played?
Or does the listener/bassist/guitarist have the right to say that the writers judgement on his own song is flawed?
Who has the right to determine that?
For example:Some may say that the bassline to this piece is too busy.

But just who decides what is the right bass line?
The writer and the bass player that submitted the bass line.


That's what I meant. If the writer determines a workable bass line for his song (or it is determined by the collaborative writer/members of that band) then that's what it should be.

Or if someone does a cover and comes up with a bassline that absolutely works.....then good.

But it has to work. Just because a guy writes a bass line doesn't mean it was good or right for the song.
 
Hey all,
so I was playing a 16th note riff on the higher frets of the G and D string, then the guitarist comes to me and says: "man, bass is not played that way". I was so upset that there was someone making rules for an instrument haha. Have you experienced this as well, that someone said, stick to the root notes or anything like that?

Cheers
Oh yeah. We would go to open jams in between gigs in Northwest Chicago and this one guitarist (we'll call him JAMES L. ) was upset that I played Jack Bruce's part in Crossroads, even though that's the song he had requested to play. I've got the tabs and I've known the song for a gazillion years, so there was no guess work. He tells me in between songs that the bass is a backround instrument and that we "can't ALL be over the top". To which I replied..."Then, why don't YOU hang back??" I know that overplaying your part can kill a song as sure as playing the wrong tempo, or note. You play that damned bass the way you feel.
 
I'm all for it as long as you maintained a firm musical foundation for the song. If you pulled the rug out from under the song and left no bass in it simply because you get bored with repetition then perhaps you chose the wrong instrument.

If you were sawing away on high 16th notes during a breakdown bridge or verse after the solo, it probably sounded amazing. If you were doing it during a big chorus or verse then you probably made your band sound like a big AM radio with no bottom just to satisfy your own boredom.

+1. This exactly. It's all about context.

So, were you soloing when this happened? Is it a "Dixieland" style jam-band, where the idea is that everyone sort of solos (or noodles) at the same time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jazzbo66
Hey all,
so I was playing a 16th note riff on the higher frets of the G and D string, then the guitarist comes to me and says: "man, bass is not played that way". I was so upset that there was someone making rules for an instrument haha. Have you experienced this as well, that someone said, stick to the root notes or anything like that?

Wouldn't worry about it. Opinions are like a$$○, everybody has one. We all don't think the same...life would be boring if that was the case.

Cheers
 
Don't you think it should be played the way that the one who wrote the song meant it to be played?
Or does the listener/bassist/guitarist have the right to say that the writers judgement on his own song is flawed?
Who has the right to determine that?
For example:Some may say that the bassline to this piece is too busy.

But just who decides what is the right bass line?
The writer and the bass player that submitted the bass line.


When I played in an originals band, I decided my bass lines!

Some of the other band members might come with suggestions, and if what I came up with and played meet strong objections among them and they had a better idea I'd listen and change it, but basically, I play the bass, I decide what I think serves the song best, and the other band members by large trust my judgement.

It's called cooperating.

If you play in a band where the individual members don't trust each other and each other's skills as far as their instruments of choice goes, you are pretty bad off in my opinion and just waiting for a breakup to happen.

I am perfectly aware that that is not how it works in a lot of bands, but non the less that brings nothing constructive with it from a perspective of serving what is best for the music.

I mean dictating what every band member should do can work.

It worked quite well for Capatain Beefheart, no one can claim that the music suffered from it at least, but as far as I know the story of The Magic Band is also a pretty in depth lesson in dysfunctional band management.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Watchootognbout

Latest posts