• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

BassTalk247 Permanently Closed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lulz. You should feel honored. You're the main reason the site was created in the first place.

BT was a great forum, and the original group had no problem with looser rules & most of us still share genuine friendship. But as usual, humans come along who take themselves way too seriously & when you have enough hypocrites hanging out in the same place, drama ensues.

TB is way worse, but due to the rules, instead of being blunt and/or honest we get post after post of passive aggressiveness & veiled insults. But it's all the same crap.
So...BassTalk247 was cool until the people who "take themselves too seriously" and the "hypocrites" came along? There was nothing in place to keep these interlopers from destroying the site so quickly? The "original group" shares no responsibility for the demise? It seems to me that the meltdown came way too quickly to place the blame on uptight members. BassTalk247 should have flourished without all those pesky TB-style draconian rules...right? Yet it's now permanently closed.

Maybe rules actually work. They'll never be perfect (because people will never be perfect), but they keep things in check enough for a site to stay together.

"Passive aggressiveness & veiled insults" are a pain, and difficult to monitor. Direct attacks and rampant thread hijacking, however, can and should be dealt with, and have been dealt with here on TB, making it a better place, IMO.

A site where members just let the fur fly yet still maintain a overall sense of helpfulness, respect and civility? I have yet to see it.
 
So...BassTalk247 was cool until the people who "take themselves too seriously" and the "hypocrites" came along? There was nothing in place to keep these interlopers from destroying the site so quickly? The "original group" shares no responsibility for the demise? It seems to me that the meltdown came way too quickly to place the blame on uptight members. BassTalk247 should have flourished without all those pesky TB-style draconian rules...right? Yet it's now permanently closed.

Maybe rules actually work. They'll never be perfect (because people will never be perfect), but they keep things in check enough for a site to stay together.

"Passive aggressiveness & veiled insults" are a pain, and difficult to monitor. Direct attacks and rampant thread hijacking, however, can and should be dealt with, and have been dealt with here on TB, making it a better place, IMO.

A site where members just let the fur fly yet still maintain a overall sense of helpfulness, respect and civility? I have yet to see it.

I'm quoting this because I can't "like" it twice.
 
I don't suppose anybody caught a pic of this, the forum appears to be down.

I didn't. Honestly, it was pure verbal diarrhea from someone who was clearly undone for whatever reason.

Yeah the thread was pretty whacked out. I read it but didn't screen capture it. And yes, the site is down now, before the various different deadlines that Ed stated it would be up until...
 
Maybe someone posted a music related thread in the forum for non-music related threads.

As someone who frequented both this site and that one, I was sorry to see it grow. Actually, there were some great music discussions - some of them got more in depth than here. Sometimes things don't work out. One advantage of a larger site (although that one was growing) is that it gives a layer of isolation, where you are not too "involved".
 
BassTalk247 should have flourished without all those pesky TB-style draconian rules...right? Yet it's now permanently closed.

It's not closed because the no rules approach didn't work. It's closed because the owner tried to force rules on the members after the fact and then had a mental breakdown. If he would have shared the views of the members and not been out of his mind, it would still be up. I truly worry less about the site being closed and more about Ed being okay.
 
Seems to me it's closed because its owner wanted it closed. Similar to the popular line around here of no free speech in a private forum, it's a private enterprise solely controlled by its owner. This place could go dark at any time if the owner so decided. I infer from my extremely limited knowledge that Ed wanted his site run a certain way, got some major flak and crap from his members, then decided to say "eff it" and shut the thing down in a spectacular display of Rage Closing.

As a business owner I can say that when things don't go your way it certainly can make you seem like you've lost your mind, whether you actually have or not. Or maybe I have... :p
 
Seems to me it's closed because its owner wanted it closed. Similar to the popular line around here of no free speech in a private forum, it's a private enterprise solely controlled by its owner. This place could go dark at any time if the owner so decided. I infer from my extremely limited knowledge that Ed wanted his site run a certain way, got some major flak and crap from his members, then decided to say "eff it" and shut the thing down in a spectacular display of Rage Closing.

As a business owner I can say that when things don't go your way it certainly can make you seem like you've lost your mind, whether you actually have or not. Or maybe I have... :p

As you said, your own "extremely limited knowledge". Obviously even those who were there don't know all. Let's not start making assumptions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.