You didn't. But you may not have specified how you have "picky fingers" and wanted the edges rolled to feel like your 75 RI, despite the flatter radius. I don't know for sure, but this quote from you definitely gives the impression that you might be partially at fault:
I've played many Fender-clone basses with similar or flatter boards, none with edges like this. None. I'm not asking for anything that should be a given for a Fender-style bass.
I didn't say you were unsatisfied with the 10" radius, I suggested you didn't think far enough ahead on what kind of effect a 10" radius would have on playability.
"You were unsure about the radius... and ultimately, you weren't satisfied with those aspects of the bass."
???
Yes, there are many factors that go into the tone of the bass...but you should know whether you like the pickups before you put them in the bass. You didn't in this case. This is something I'd put on you as the customer. Why go with a pickup you are unsure of?
I don't care about the pickups. I can easily change those out at any time with minimal expense. I believe I posted this in so many words. I went with them because Ben suggested them.
No, it's not blatantly misaligned. It's simply aligned that way...and has been aligned that way on previous basses he's made. That's just how he makes those basses, and it doesn't look wrong, at least to me.
Ben told me himself he didn't even notice it on those basses, so it's not his "design," per se. Also, it's not like a 75 bass, which is what I ordered, so it's not right.
Then how come the changes? If you really knew what you were looking for in this bass, you would have seen his other projects, taken that into account, and added that to the list of things that you wanted, AKA light neck, string tree, different pickups, and a high amount of rolling on the FB edges.
I did see several of his other instruments, however, I have not had the chance to play them. And I did spec a well-balancing bass, so a lighter neck than the one that was one this one would fall well within my specs. None of the things you mentioned above, including heavy necks, odd-placed string trees, or little FB rolling were part of his other basses that I knew of. However, these things are clearly shown in many pictures of 75 jazz basses, which again, is what I ordered.
I didn't want, and still don't want, any more rolling on the fingerboard than any other Fender or Fender-clone instrument. I'm not asking for anything that doesn't fall within the specs of "Fender 75 jazz bass." Any deviations from that starting point that I agreed to had nothing to do with string trees, FB rolling, etc.
The only thing I can see that he didn't get right is the binding...and even that is in question by folks other than me:
I cleared this up already in the comment above. There were several things.
I did say I could have the wrong interpretation, but I'm working with the picture you've painted in this thread. And if you don't want honest responses, don't open a thread asking for them.
I love honest responses as long as they're constructive. Your first post here was blatant sarcasm, which I don't fit into the category of "honest responses" or constructive responses, or heck, even civil responses.