Hey guys! I'm back from a wonderful gig in Louisville.
Let me tell you what, this cab is totally kicks **s. Totally stood up to anything I subjected it to... loud digging in on the E and B strings, slapping, etc., and it sounded equally beautiful on the low volume tunes at the very beginning of the night.
Like often happens, the differences that I hear at home and that you can hear on the comparison clip, (and on the couple of low volume gigs I've had it on) between the AE212 and AE410 are more impactful when you crank it up.
The AE212 is MUCH more low end extended and fat than the AE410. The B string is just round and full versus the more 'grindy' sort of response of the AE410, and the entire cab is smoother in the upper mids (versus that VERY aggressive upper mid spike in the AE410 voicing).
So, the low end notes and the slap tone are more growly and meaty versus the very bright, grindy and quite unforgiving tone of the AE410. The upper treble is the same on both (not surprisingly, since the tweeter is the same), but the treble is a bit more airy on the AE212... i.e., a bit of space between the top of the driver response and the tweeter, versus an almost 'overlapping' tone between the tweeter and top of the driver with the AE410.
I used my Sadowsky NYC Vintage ash/maple with singles and my F500 on this gig (a nice, loud pop gig with no front of house support... 8 piece band).
It really sounded good. For comparison... just as deep as my 410UL but with MUCH better lower mid punch and much more even mid response through its entire range.
So, it really is a smoother, fatter sounding AE410. I love both cabs, but at least with the Sadowsky, the AE212's 'fatness' was just a beautiful thing.
I've never been so pleased with the sound of a rig... period
Highly recommended!!!!
Let me tell you what, this cab is totally kicks **s. Totally stood up to anything I subjected it to... loud digging in on the E and B strings, slapping, etc., and it sounded equally beautiful on the low volume tunes at the very beginning of the night.
Like often happens, the differences that I hear at home and that you can hear on the comparison clip, (and on the couple of low volume gigs I've had it on) between the AE212 and AE410 are more impactful when you crank it up.
The AE212 is MUCH more low end extended and fat than the AE410. The B string is just round and full versus the more 'grindy' sort of response of the AE410, and the entire cab is smoother in the upper mids (versus that VERY aggressive upper mid spike in the AE410 voicing).
So, the low end notes and the slap tone are more growly and meaty versus the very bright, grindy and quite unforgiving tone of the AE410. The upper treble is the same on both (not surprisingly, since the tweeter is the same), but the treble is a bit more airy on the AE212... i.e., a bit of space between the top of the driver response and the tweeter, versus an almost 'overlapping' tone between the tweeter and top of the driver with the AE410.
I used my Sadowsky NYC Vintage ash/maple with singles and my F500 on this gig (a nice, loud pop gig with no front of house support... 8 piece band).
It really sounded good. For comparison... just as deep as my 410UL but with MUCH better lower mid punch and much more even mid response through its entire range.
So, it really is a smoother, fatter sounding AE410. I love both cabs, but at least with the Sadowsky, the AE212's 'fatness' was just a beautiful thing.
I've never been so pleased with the sound of a rig... period
Highly recommended!!!!