TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've got the F500 and both the AE212 and AE410. I'd highly recommend the AE212 for the F500, whereas I think the LMII sounds better with the AE410.
The AE410 is an aggressive, aggressive cab, and the F500 has got more than its share of bite as well. I found that the two together can be pretty tough to tame, particularly if you're not looking for a whole lot of in-your-face upper mids and top end. Now, with the semi-parametric EQ on the F500, you can definitely dial it down, but you're effectively going against the nature of the AE410.
With the AE212, the F500 rips through a mix without being too offensive in the top end. The flatter response of the AE212 allows the bite of the F500 to work in the mix, while the bit of extra booty that the AE212 has keeps your sound fat.
I am buying a new cab this week for my f500 and can't decide in the ae212 or 410. I play in a country band mostly and it will be used as a stand alone cab. I use a variety of basses but my main squeeze is a Lakland 5502.
As another data point for you, here is a comparison of the AE212 and the AE410 with the F500. I used my Sadowsky, which is quite a bit brighter and 'grindier' than your 5502, but at least its something
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
wonder how would the tone hammer 500 pair up with the AE212, any thoughts?
6 days ago and no report? I'm reporting this post to a moderator!Mine has arrived. Should get to test drive it some tonight.![]()
My guess is that it will totally kill! My Tone Hammer sounds FANTASTIC into the FX return of my Shuttle 9.0 with the AE212. The Tone Hammer is one of my favorite pieces of gear in the history of things I've owned. With the AGS off, it is ultra clean but warm. It can sound very active and modern in this mode, but the sweeping mid control lets you set it to do all kinds of things. In AGS mode, it can go from subtle vintage warmth to snarly OD. The new TH500 head to me should be a slam dunk right out of the gate as long as there are no design flaws or failure issues. That's doubtful to happen coming from Aguilar, so I would buy with confidence. I was thinking that my next head would be a Streamliner before Aguilar announced this. I'm not so sure now.wonder how would the tone hammer 500 pair up with the AE212, any thoughts?
Pure speculation on my part, but I think for my tone goals, I'd prefer the TH500 with the AE410 (most Agie electronics sound better to me with a bit of tightening-up in the low end and a bit of zing in the upper mids).
My guess is that it will totally kill! My Tone Hammer sounds FANTASTIC into the FX return of my Shuttle 9.0 with the AE212. The Tone Hammer is one of my favorite pieces of gear in the history of things I've owned. With the AGS off, it ultra clean but warm. It can sound very active and modern in this mode, but the sweeping mid control lets you get it to do all kinds of things. In AGS mode, it can go from subtle vintage warmth to snarly OD. The new TH500 head to me should be a slam dunk right out of the gate as long as their are no design flaws or failure issues. That's doubtful to happen coming from Aguilar, so I would buy with confidence. I was thinking that my next head would be a Streamliner before Aguilar announced this. I'm not so sure now.
I am curious if anybody else has used a non Class D amp with the AE212?
6 days ago and no report? I'm reporting this post to a moderator!
EDIT: WHOOPS! I see that Chef is one step ahead of me.
Yea I'm debating myself now between the TH500, Streamliner and The Shuttle 9.2.
I am having the same internal debate. What to hear some NAMM reports on these from Vic, Tom or anyone else who was able to compare.
Ha, I had to get a second job to pay for my GAS purchases, JK. I have done some bedroom test with this cab only and no gigs, so I was waiting to make a more educated statement. So far I have only used my GK MB200 for pairing and haven't hooked up the M6. I have rehearsal tonight and planning on taking the MB200 and the AE212. So far I am digging it and did notice some more low end after some break-in period. It is sitting next to my AE410 so I did compare the MB200/AE410 with the MB/AE212 and like KJ has said before more similiar than different. I bump the high mids and reduce a little bass on the AE212 and it sounds pretty similiar to the AE410. The difference in weight is not real noticeable for me and schelp with the AE212 is not drastically different than the AE410 IMO. Maybe through door openings.
Anyway more to come....
I am having the same internal debate. What to hear some NAMM reports on these from Vic, Tom or anyone else who was able to compare.