Powered and unpowered 16s coming up to the last frontier.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Jake, considering what you're used to playing through, the "best/most enjoyable live sound you've ever had" is saying a lot. You mention a "plump and massive low end." How do you feel that the voicing of the cab compares to that of the Flex? Even though I end up playing my 112 the most, the Flex has always impressed me with its 3D mids (which you mentioned) and the crazy, punch-in-the-chest articulation it has with fast fingerstyle. Very "chunky" with palm-musting, too. Maybe another way to phrase the question would be, "How's the 109 hang with the Flex in fingerstyle articulation/note separation, palm-muting, and percussive techniques?"
Are there any circumstances in which you've felt the low end to be too much (whatever that might mean in a given situation), or has that not been an issue?
right?Not ready to sell the Jule quite yet P. Got to check the hype on the 16. But you are right. The Felix into a powered speaker/s seems like a really wonderful alternative to everything.
I don't see that the powered version is up on the site yet -- only the passive version. Last I talked to Mike, he said that he'd showed a couple at NAMM (first I knew that he even made any powered speakers). My understanding -- which could easily be wrong, since we spent about ten seconds talking about the powered 16 -- is that it incorporates the new 700 Watt Ice module that's being used in the Mesa and Genzler amps, among others. That thing has way more than enough juice to drive a little 16 (and Mike mentioned running two at NAMM), so I'd assume that if you wanted to run two (more?) you'd use one powered cab and one (or more?) passive cabs (and I assume that's what @flatback is alluding to a couple of posts up).Powered 16?
I checked Mike's website and facebook - apparently presented at NAMM - but couldn't find any info or pictures. Where do I need to look?
Edit: Found it, I only checked the electric bass part of Mike's website.
Good luck -- and have fun! If I'm running my rig, I never want bass in the monitors anymore. I -- and everyone else on stage -- hear me better if we're relying on my cab.Got the biggest gig yet with my band this thursday @ the CA State Fair. Ill really get to turn up MA109(#1) and see what it can give me. No bass in the monitors for me.
You're right! My bad. Again, I'm not sure about the module -- I think Mike said something about the 700 ASC, but it was a blip in the conversation, so don't quote me on that. Would be a lot of amp for a single 16, but would make sense powering multiple speakers.MarkA, there are no detailed specs on the website yet, but you can toggle between the powered and unpowered versions of the 16.
http://www.masoundworks.com/manage.numo?pid=21&module=shopping_cart&component=catalog&cid=1
Jake, thanks. That is a helpful description. Not hyperbolic if that's how you really feel about it! I'm very interested in the note envelope and how different links in the chain (player, instrument, amp, cab) affect it. Bloom and present but un-harsh articulation are helpful descriptors. How about when you put the brakes on? How do notes stop with the 109 vs. with the Flex?Yeah, I guess I got a little hyperbolic in that post, but it was pretty much the best sound I've had on a gig like that. re: the low end response of the 109 vs the flex top, I would say the the 109 is open and wider and breathes/blooms more in the low end than the flex, which is more of that focused upper bass hit in the chest, as you say. The 109 hits lower and has a bigger and wider yet still very controlled feel, which I really like.
The gig I used it on was a trio with a flamenco guitarist and drummer. The material calls for a LOT of chords and percussive rhythmic playing. Chord melody, palm muted tumbao, all kinds of cool parts that call for a cabinet that has plenty of present but decidedly un-harsh articulation. It worked great for that gig.
I really think a pair of these would sound amazingly full, deep and balanced, and be able to handle at least as much volume as the flex210. Which is, to say, an absolute $#!& ton.
Hope that helps.
I using a pair of 116's non powered. They're great for home and small venues. I play strictly electric , these days, fretted and fret less Skjold's. 5 strings set up E to high C. They' can get pretty loud for their size. I also love the way one sounds with a 1203. Very amazing cabs!!
I didn't get this the first time I read it. I was like, The Last Frontier? Is that a bar? Is he on a spaceship? But then I noticed that you're in Alaska.Powered and unpowered 16s coming up to the last frontier.
I talked with someone who stacked a 45 and a 46 and said that they worked well together. I don't know if you'd run into any potential funniness with having the speakers sort of cross-firing with you in the middle, though. (That's how I'm picturing the setup you describe.)Kinda curious if the powered 16 at my feet will pair well with a 45 placed behind the band.
MarkA, there are no detailed specs on the website yet, but you can toggle between the powered and unpowered versions of the 16.
http://www.masoundworks.com/manage.numo?pid=21&module=shopping_cart&component=catalog&cid=1