I grew up on Aerosmith. Based on last nights performance, Joe Perry has forgotten how to play his own songs. Retire
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Grammy winner 1980Why? She's a big disposable pop star, and that's often who gets a bunch of Grammys.
End of the Story.The Grammys are not, if they ever really have been, a measure of achievement. It’s a hollow, self-congratulating promotional tool, and nothing more, just like the Academy Awards. Utterly manipulated, and actually quite desperate, as NARAS, and the entire recording industry is increasingly irrelevant.
Huh? How does that not make her a pop star? I hate to split genre hairs, but: It's not rock, jazz, soul, R&B, Hip Hop, blues and so on; and "pop" doesn't exclusively refer to bubblegum. Unless "Soundcloud" is a genre, Eilish is pop. Plenty of people start early, that doesn't mean you're good.Erm, she's anything but a pop star. She has been writing her own tunes for years and she's only a middle-teenager now.
"Alternative?" Alternative to what? People have written "dark" lyrics and music for decades; Soundcloud is full of music inspired by benzodiazepines and recorded in bedrooms. She and her brother went from Soundcloud to a major label (Interscope) practically overnight.She's extremely alternative, most of her stuff is written specifically not to be radio friendly pop stuff.
Tori Amos is as much pop as she is anything else. If you insist that "female singer-songwriter" is its own genre, Tori had plenty of forerunners -- Joni Mitchell, Aimee Mann, Natalie Merchant, Kate Bush, Patti Smith, Suzanne Vega, Laura Nyro, Rickie Lee Jones to name a few.She's extremely NOT pop - much more like tori amos or someone like that who is brilliant and very out there, but has happened to write a couple of songs that reached a larger audience.
I disagree, I dug it and The Roots backing him sounded great. IMHO and all that...…...He was absolutely horrible...terrible singing, typical lyrical content, and sloppy guitar playing with an absolutely disgusting guitar tone that sounds like an 80's Crate combo amp.
I think it has to do with a more DIY thing, than anything else. It's easy to sing that way without having much in the way of technique, and many people find it appealing and relatable.Billie Eilish is among them. But I’ve noticed the past year or so especially, an influx of vocalists that have a vocal style like they’re singing quietly or mumbling a tune while in public. I hope that visual makes sense?
Not bad at all, just the “let’s sing very softly, almost to not draw attention to myself”.
I’ve used this same technique many times walking my dog while wearing headphones....just to much less fanfare
Got Dam, *** has happened to this world? We went from seriously bad ass rock stars to some entitled teen saying she’s a bad guy.
She’ll be forgotten in a couple years, then it’ll be some other dippoopie. Lizzo is alright, better than Eilish for a fact.
Of course, let’s not forget the Grammy’s doesn’t represent what is actually good music, just what the dumbass masses gorge down their ignorant throats.
On a more positive note, Camila Cabello singing to her dad was just marvelous, especially with the producers of the show teasing it with the ambiguous lead-in and then syncing up the performance with the home movies of the family.
Really well-done... A+
I'm surprised no one is really talking about that anywhere. I hadn't really heard her before but had heard of her. I was surprised at her perfect pitch, inflection, control, emotion, and tone during that performance. I had no idea she could really sing like that. The absolute best performance of the night.
was it as bad as folks say it was? i wanted to see it this morning but it is blocked in the u.s. (through normal channels).
Why? She's a big disposable pop star, and that's often who gets a bunch of Grammys.