I'm not a citizen of the US but I find it strange that after 500 years suddenly an Islamic connection, hidden throughout history (even though the article claims 30% of the slaves where muslims) miraculously shows up.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm not a citizen of the US but I find it strange that after 500 years suddenly an Islamic connection, hidden throughout history (even though the article claims 30% of the slaves where muslims) miraculously shows up.
One "scholar" with an obvious Islamic objective does not equal solid scholarship.
1. Blues is greatly influenced by slave music. This is not up for debate. Everyone already knows this.
2. Slave music was greatly influenced by the music they brought over from Africa. Again, this is not up for debate. This is very well established.
3. This is where we start breaking into her thesis. A large portion of Africans were Muslim (well known fact) and there is some evidence that their religion may have carried some stylistic developments into their music.

I don't suppose the historical facts will mean much to anyone with an Islamic agenda, but I'll try to interject some anyway.
Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is ludicrous. Only a very small minority of slaves originally from Africa were Muslim. There is no historical evidence to the contrary, and the regions of Africa from which most of the slaves originated were not Muslim regions.
This is a blatant and shameful rewriting of history to advance an Islamic agenda. And no, it is not hateful to say so.
I don't suppose the historical facts will mean much to anyone with an Islamic agenda, but I'll try to interject some anyway.
Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is ludicrous. Only a very small minority of slaves originally from Africa were Muslim. There is no historical evidence to the contrary, and the regions of Africa from which most of the slaves originated were not Muslim regions.
This is a blatant and shameful rewriting of history to advance an Islamic agenda. And no, it is not hateful to say so.
What the heck is an Islamic agenda?
Wow, this thread went SEVEN POSTS, and then someone had to start stirring stuff up...is this a new record or something?![]()
If you don't know, then I don't suppose I can explain it to you.

McHaven,
you have to admit the sudden revelation of the influence of Islam on blues, elluding generations of musicologists, academic music history researchers and blues musicians themselves is quite puzzling.
the background of the article's author and the weak foundations of their ideas really make me wonder if this is an academic article because it doesn't stand in any academic standard or answers any rule of conducting a factual research and besides, if Islamic culture is derived by Arabic culture (and it is as explained in this very thread) why has the author chose to showcase it as an Islamic influence which is a religion versus Arabic influence which bears a much more accurate description of the historical artistic nature of Islam and no political relevance as opposed to portraying it as an achivement of the Islamic religion?
