I'm fleshing out an electronica project which would have a master clock so everyone's gear can be beat synced. I wanted to record some proof-of-concept stuff using "standard" hardware effects instead of pure software via a laptop. I happen to use Reaper and since the GT-10B and Line6 M9 were physically slaving off the signal sent I assumed it was "working". Heh.
Honestly, software is the way to go for pure electronica. Way more control, tones, options, yadda yadda. But it can be much more complicated to program overall since you have so many more choices, and you have to rely on a computer which always worries me. I can't tell you how many times the Windows laptop I happen to have has lost connection to my firewire interface. I always assumed the problems were related to the PC Card which doesn't really lock into the card slot is the problem, but who knows. Usually you reboot and it's magically fixed. But I've had it lose connection to the interface in mid-use at least once. That'd kill a show.
Anyway, that's significantly detracting from the GT-10B conversations here.
But really with the GT-10B and a Line6 M9 in the effects loop there's a ton of experimental options. The M9 has at least a couple interesting filters available, unique verb, good distortion/fuzz. You can run an A/B channel, put the M9 in Channel B, and really have some fun with it running a totally separate and unique sounding signal blended back in.
I certainly don't pretend to be an expert at any of this, and there's really so many options available it can be confusing and time consuming. But I always find myself wanting MORE than whatever the gear can provide, usually simple/silly stuff like MIDI THRU. That would let the GT-10B truly serve as my hub. It could receive the clock, pass that thru to the M9, and them I could also use the GT-10B to fully control the M9 via MIDI. I could have patches that send the GT-10B expression as CC1 to the M9 so I don't have to lug a totaly separate expression just for the M9. The M9 can also change patches (scenes) via MIDI, but it only has 24 of those so I run into another problem as the GT-10B blindly sends PC changes that match the internal GT-10B patches. So in order for the GT-10B to automatically set the patches (scenes) on the M9 I'm limited to only the first 24 patches in the GT-10B. While there is an INBOUND PC map in the GT-10B there's no OUTBOUND PC map to let you control what PC the GT-10B transmits. It's all of those little nit picky things that get annoying quickly.
Not that software is any less annoying. But there's always a tool available to transpose/map/etc. MIDI and do whatever else you want.
I actually own an old MOTU AV Timepiece that can route and merge MIDI channels that I'd probably end up using if it got that far. Then I could connect all of the MIDI gear to that and program a routing table so everything got the clock and the GT-10B sends MIDI data to the M9 for expression control, etc. though I don't believe it can re-map PC data as that's fairly complicated. But it might.
And I think I just typed another short novel.... ENJOY!

Haha.