Is there something else about the design that would perhaps explain CT’s bias toward a longer scale? This in turn begs the question (I only have a pedestrian knowledge of CT basses) if CT is mostly known (as implied) for these non standard scales, why OP would consider him a good choice for a 34 build? I’m curious what type of bridge design was to be incorporated with OP’s bass and if that played a role in CT’s advice as well.

