• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Carvin SB5000 / SB4000 Roll Call...Part 2!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I received my SB5000 on July 1st. I must say I am extremely impressed! From the construction, to the tone, I am really feelin' it. Mine is ash with rosewood board and abalone blocks. I kept it simple yet traditional with a tort guard. It came in at 9.5 lbs exactly.

Your bass looks amazing!! I especially LOVE the look of the ash body with the tort guard. The selection of the rosewood fretboard for that configuration was a good call too.
 
I have a LB75 and have been looking at a SB5000 What I'm reading here is telling me that I can't lose. My problem is, should I lose the LB75 and pick up a P and then an SB5 or have the SB5 AND a LB75 in the arsenal. I feel that I really need a good passive bolt on P style for all my rock stuff and the active 5 for more fusion, worship, top 40 pop stuff... Life is so difficult with decisions like these. Any feedback or suggestions?
 
Has anyone experimented with running the strings through the body vs. the bridge on their SB5000? I would be interested to see what your experiences are.

I've had multiple basses with the through the body or through the bridge options and I've never been able to tell much difference either way. I tried running the strings through the bridge on my SB5000 and noticed a considerable difference. Through the bridge provided more attack and more percussive tones over the through the body option.

I agree with you. I never really noticed a difference with other string through basses until the sb5000. I feel like through body gives it a darker, more compressed sound, IMHO. I've been much happier with the strings through the bridge.
 
Has anyone experimented with running the strings through the body vs. the bridge on their SB5000? I would be interested to see what your experiences are.

I've had multiple basses with the through the body or through the bridge options and I've never been able to tell much difference either way. I tried running the strings through the bridge on my SB5000 and noticed a considerable difference. Through the bridge provided more attack and more percussive tones over the through the body option.

I agree with you. I never really noticed a difference with other string through basses until the sb5000. I feel like through body gives it a darker, more compressed sound, IMHO. I've been much happier with the strings through the bridge.
 
I have a LB75 and have been looking at a SB5000 What I'm reading here is telling me that I can't lose. My problem is, should I lose the LB75 and pick up a P and then an SB5 or have the SB5 AND a LB75 in the arsenal. I feel that I really need a good passive bolt on P style for all my rock stuff and the active 5 for more fusion, worship, top 40 pop stuff... Life is so difficult with decisions like these. Any feedback or suggestions?

I've only had my SB5000 a week so I can't comment too much on how close it can cover some P bass tones since I haven't had a gig with this bass yet. IMO the SB5000 is very versatile and can get a wide range of tones, with that said I'm still planning on keeping my P basses.

If you are thinking of pickup up a SB5000 then I would keep what you have and play the SB5000 before making the decision on letting the LB75 go. With my limited experience so far, a P bass and a SB5000 could cover just about anything out there.
 
Didnt realize there was a club on here for these. Just arrived last week and i love it.
3495efba.jpg

db4652d5.jpg

f3dbe81c.jpg

dd03a870.jpg

049bbbdf.jpg
 
Just arrived. Sorry for the so-so photos. All I could do at the moment. Specs:

Alder body (requested lightweight piece and got it!), maple neck
Rosewood Fretboard
Satin Finish on Back of Neck
Active Electronics
Antique Brown Stain Flame
Birdseye Natural Headstock
Abalone Block Inlays
10" Fretboard Radius
Abalone Carvin Logo
Metal Knobs with Abalone Inlays
Red Tortoise Pickguard
Ivory Graph Tech Nut

In person, it looks simply awesome. I can't wait to play it!
 

Attachments

  • IMG00449.jpg
    IMG00449.jpg
    36.2 KB · Views: 360
  • IMG00450.jpg
    IMG00450.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 207
A few more photos (I don't have my real camera with me, so the picture quality isn't great). The Antique Brown Stain Flame looks magnificent in person. The Satin Finish on Back of Neck option feels great.


Just arrived. Sorry for the so-so photos. All I could do at the moment. Specs:

Alder body (requested lightweight piece and got it!), maple neck
Rosewood Fretboard
Satin Finish on Back of Neck
Active Electronics
Antique Brown Stain Flame
Birdseye Natural Headstock
Abalone Block Inlays
10" Fretboard Radius
Abalone Carvin Logo
Metal Knobs with Abalone Inlays
Red Tortoise Pickguard
Ivory Graph Tech Nut

In person, it looks simply awesome. I can't wait to play it!
 

Attachments

  • IMG00453.jpg
    IMG00453.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 212
  • IMG00454.jpg
    IMG00454.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 171
Just back from a short vacation with the family. I had a chance to stop by Bass Emporium in Austin, Texas today. I got to play several basses there. Fenders, Pedullas, Laklands, Spectors, Modulus, EB Music Mans, etc. And I walked out very happy with my SB5000. I played a Pedulla Jazz Bass type bass that I liked similar to my SB5000, but flipped the price tag over to find it at $3400! I played a Modulus as well that I liked, but it was in the $2200 range or so. None of the Fenders were even in the ballpark, imo. I picked up a Lakland Skyline on purpose to check it out since a lot of people compare them to the SB's. Unplugged, it felt ok. In the same ballpark, I thought. I didn't like the neck profile anywhere near the SB5000 though. So I plugged it in... no comparison to the SB tone, imo. There was a $800 Spector there that felt kinda nice for the price. It had the big EMG humbuckers in it so, I didn't plug it in. I saw another guy plug one in though and it didn't sound that great to me. I was hoping to play a Sadowsky, but they had none in stock.

I was hoping to check out some amps like the TC RH450 and stuff, but they were out of stock on a lot of the popular amps including the Shuttle 9.0. They said the Shuttle 9.0 and RH450's sell as soon as they hit the store along with all the Sadowskys that come in.

The trip made me happy overall with my current gear selection and especially the SB5000.
 
Say did that Pedulla look like this Rapture 5? I saw one on eBay and wondered how it would compare to an SB5000.

I have both the Pudulla j2 Rapture and the SB5000. I like the tone on the SB5000 better because of the clarity of the tone and how deep the tone can get.

The Pudulla is no joke either the bass can really sing but can't compare to lows of the Sb5000. But if you'll looking to get funky go with the SB5000. I use the Pudulla with main group that sing mellow songs and the Sb5000 with my other band.

Both are very nice basses to own.
DSCF2611.jpg
:hyper:
bass073.gif
:bassist:
 
Nice to know that the SBs can hold its own against a Pedulla. I've always been intrigued by the Pedulla Rapture--you know, the ole Jazz on steriods thing. But I also found the body to be a little too dinky looking (I'm 6'4") and as Jarrett mentioned, there is that little matter with the price tag too.

Thanks for the info guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.