OH is this the guy that makes the Chapman Stick? Well that's cool!
No, it's a different Chap, man.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
OH is this the guy that makes the Chapman Stick? Well that's cool!

Surely you know Rob Chappers
So let me see if I have the jist. It sounds like you pay a 50£ deposit to participate in the "R & D" for a newly designed bass. If you want to buy one once it's developed, your deposit is applied to the cost of the bass. If you don't want one, your deposit is refunded.
I don't want to sound like a cynic, but so far, I'm in agreement with mmbongo. It sounds awfully similar to the "other thread" featuring a bass in development.
I would advice anyone looking at this to go read and watch youtube and follow the development of the two guitars already produced and the third and fourth which I think are underway. There is a concept behind the whole idea more than just knocking to gether an instrument and selling it on.
This one is being done a little differently. Basically because it is a guitar community and Rob has a lot of guitar followers through his web shows, lessons and Youtube channel. The voting for the guitars were open. So there were something 30,000 people voting on a guitar that would have a run of 350 or something. Interest was there and of course it would all pan out to sell the product.
When it was suggested they do the same for a bass the initial reaction from the "Company" (Basically Rob his manager and help from a music store) was being a guitarist forum their wouldn't be enough interest. Eventually they relented and said if they get 100 "Pledges" they would go further with the idea. So part of the Pledge idea is to see if they have the interest before moving on .
The pledge thing has another effect. They are the only ones to vote. That will stop 30,000 guitarists voting on a bass either they don't want, won't buy and will stop it being a guitarists vision of what a bass should be like by virtue of out numbering the number of bassists. .
I'm in if only because I love the idea and concept and followed the last stages of the first guitar and then the 2nd.
It's different and there will only be a minimum run. The guitars very rarely turn up 2nd hand so they can't be all that bad.
he is looking for 100 people that are interested in the bass to vote for all the specs. These people must pledge 50£ (around 70-80$) in the end of the voting
No one is paying to vote. You vote, and, if you like, you pay.
I'm just trying to imagine what a committee of 100 bassists would come up with? Edsel comes to mind...
Pledging is not paying. You pledge to pony up 50 (metric) bones if you decide to buy it. The pledge is a symbolic gesture to see how much interest there is in a bass. I'm not seeing why this is so hard.
Well, my cynical side got the best of me. It sounds like the "Company" is asking potential customers to pay to do the R&D. Not cool, IMHO.
If he's so interested in diversifying his business, maybe Rob should front his own R&D costs or solicit genuine investors to participate in his business instead of asking his potential customers to do so. I humbly suggest he become a member of Talkbass and spend some time interacting with the thousands of bassists here for ideas on developing a bass. That is unless he's got hoards of people with money in hand just begging him to build a bass. In that case, he doesn't need us.