B-b-b-but anecdotes!Check accident stats for kids with and without helmet, with or without proper protection in cars. It may make you rethink your position.
In the holy good times you're talking about, 20x as many people as today died on the road
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
B-b-b-but anecdotes!Check accident stats for kids with and without helmet, with or without proper protection in cars. It may make you rethink your position.
In the holy good times you're talking about, 20x as many people as today died on the road
In the People's Republic of California, bicycle riders under the age of 16 are required by law to wear helmets.Welcome to parenting. I think you've got two separate issues here.
First, you get to decide how much modern safety apparatus your kids need. The child seats are required by law. Bike helmets aren't. The only anecdote I can offer is that my kids have always been required to wear bike helmets, and the idea that it's an imposition on their freedom wouldn't have occurred to them at age three -- that's purely an issue for adults. Most of the kids in my locale have grown up thinking that a helmet is just a normal part of riding a bike.
Second, the judgment of the neighbors... that's been with us since time immoral.
I get it. I have raised three generations of kids. I got great grandkids. All are healthy and whole... Just struggling with all the regulation that infers I'm not adept enough to keep kids healthy.
In the spirit of the thread, if you're not wearing suitable attire; pads, an approved helmet and a chastity belt, give me back my skatie and get outta my pool.
This thread rocks. You guys ROCK! … So, rock me, Baby…. It's OK. Let 'em fly. I'm wearing adequate padding. My bubble-wrap is like a shield of steel!
But in the spirit of child protection and general safety, laws hopefully were never envisioned to encumber the good guys. We still benefit though, when things go wrong. Laws are an unfortunate complication. They are, in practical terms, most often a sledgehammer to crack open that egg of potential disaster - it's not 'the greatest good for the greatest number' but the greatest good for all. In this pursuit, we still fail - as do lots of our laws - but at least we fail to a lesser degree. Abuse is a bad, bad thing, whichever way you look at it. Always, better to be safe than sorry.
These videos have nothing whatsoever to do with the OP but everything to do with protecting our fellow citizens, and sometimes from themselves - it's evidence that the task is impossible but still fundamentally worthwhile. Note well that young Chloe was wearing a helmet, at least for a while. She needed much more help and it was not given. Why not? That's a good question.
This is serious, not in the spirit of the thread. But I understand all too well why people get so upset. Who was it said, 'this is why we can't have nice things.'? Hats off to that individualist.
I visit coffee shops regularly, yet I've never been warned about the coffee being hot.
Yeah, I'm off the stuff too. Diabolical, it is. Too good.Ok... Boneheads like that have no business tending children. It's folks like this that cause the rest of us to have our better judgment preordained for us. And that in itself is my issue.
Look, yesterday I was all hopped up on cake and ice cream. A dangerous combination for an old guy. I should have never opened the door..... And really.. The bike I was talking about is for a three year old. The thing is a glorified tricycle.
I take my kids safety more seriously than most really. Just rather nauseated that I live in a world that requires that the coffee shop has to warn me that my coffee is hot and one that has people foolish enough to require that all safety concerns be legislated. That's all.
I am over the cake and ice cream rush and apologize for opening a delicate door here.
What result? See post #52:It's a result of litigation. Check out a McDonald's coffee cup sometime.
Just about every warning label out there can usually be traced back to some moron that sued some company for not expressly stating "Don't do this".
As for lawsuits, they are the only way for the public to enforce discipline on corporations.I visit coffee shops regularly, yet I've never been warned about the coffee being hot.
^This! (Just to be clear, the above post is a tongue-in-cheek response to a previous post)B-b-b-but anecdotes!
I was all set to use the hair dryer while I was still in the shower, so I could save a couple of minutes, but then I read the warning label on the cordIt's a result of litigation. Check out a McDonald's coffee cup sometime.
Just about every warning label out there can usually be traced back to some moron that sued some company for not expressly stating "Don't do this".
+1
Over-regulation demeans us by insulting our intelligence. It robs us of dignity, as it is meant to do.
I was in an airport bar in Salt Lake, awaiting a connecting flight, when this great old cowboy stepped up to the bar. He was eighty if he was a day, but when he ordered a NON-ALCOHOLIC BEER, the bartenders requested ID.
And when I complained on Pop's behalf, as is my surly wont, I was met with major stinkeye and "Yer not a terrorist, are you, Pal?" after-glances. It is a racket, I tell ya. Junior's helmet included.