• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Alleva Coppolo (Part 11!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The rig that night was my F1 into a berg HS410...
21977_1312818628988_1486334596_8291.jpg
 
MDFreeze said:
The RA that I bought off Ken is exactly like he stated. More like an LG than the LM. To me, it's the perfect mix though and I've been using it consistantly in about 90% of my gigs because it sits so well in the mix. I do pop, church, and jazz gigs. I really get the tone I've been looking for my jazz combo which amazed me the most. Just an amazing instrument. I also bought an LG4 recently and it was great as well, but yet I just don't use fours as much, so I parted with it last week to make room for some other gear. Ken I know I've said it before, but THANK YOU!

I'm going to have a go at Ken here and revive the LG/LM/RA debate from the Part 10. I kid, Ken. . . I only kid!

Since I barely ever comment in threads anymore, I figured this was worth it. If I get booed out of the AC thread, I'll go start an alder/maple/70's placement Club thread, but I figure that as a former AC owner/club member, I am fit to comment here.

I echo the sentiments of MDFreeze here regarding the alder/maple/single coil w/ 70's pickup placement recipe. I believe I owned the RA that Jonno's got, if not, then one with the same spec's, as well as an LG, an LMG (alder/rosewood/70's placement), and I've played an LM. I've owned several Ateliers (ash/maple/60's placement), Sadowsky's (ash/maple/60), Fodera (alder/maple/60) etc...

My current bass is a Valenti 5: alder/maple/Sadowsky pre/Nordstrand 70's wind singles in 70's position. For my tone preferences, this thing is IT. I think I prefer it for the exact reason that Ken doesn't - it lacks that upper mid "gank" as he decribes it, and has more polite growl than aggressive grind.

It's the perfect combination of warm, round low end and punch, with some serious growl, and plenty of high end sizzle. It's a very unique voice with the 70's spacing, which I can really hear when soloing up high, slapping, or just digging in.

I think my problem has always been that the 60's placement was a bit too round, and big down low for me - or maybe not enough definition to the notes is a better way to describe it. I love the 70's ash/maple (heavy ash) tone for slap... LOVE IT. But the fingerstyle tone was always a bit too grindy for my taste. With alder/rosewood, the tone was great for a few sets, with brand new stainless strings, but it never had quite enough bite for me.

Enter the early 70's spec. It just happens to work perfectly for me. As Joe said, a bastard child, but adopted by moi.

I also believe it has a lot to do with my fingers and attack. A friend of mine at church who also owned a Valenti for a while has 'harsher' fingers than I do. We can pick up the same bass, EQ'ed the same way, same amp, etc... and when I play fingerstyle it always sounds a bit bigger, warmer - when he plays it's always got a bit more edge and bite.

I now get weekly, effusive praise from our sound guy and guitarist, both of whom have run sound for every big act who's ever come through here (Vic Wooten, Mayer, and so forth). Direct into a Countryman DI and to the board. Every week it's, "Man! I can't believe how good that bass sounds!"

Of all the Fodera's, Sadowsky's, AC's, etc... that I've paraded in front of them over the years, that says an awful lot. And I think a lot of it has to do with how the bass's tone compliments the sound of my fingers, or vice versa. Perfect fit.

Anyway, I credit the RA with helping me figure this out. Unfortunately AC's and I don't get along, but my experience with the RA helped me to know when I saw my Valenti that it was the one for me.

Hopefully that's helpful for some of you "on the fence" cats.

Carry on. . .
 
I echo the sentiments of MDFreeze here regarding the alder/maple/single coil w/ 70's pickup placement recipe.
...
For my tone preferences, this thing is IT...
I think I'm in your camp as well. FWIW, I played some LM's and RA's back to back at NAMM, both in relatively quiet times as well as when the acoustic hell was in full swing. Between the two, the RA also fit me best. I also have a Geddy Lee and totally love that thing (for those that don't know, it's also alder/maple/70's). I totally get why Ken digs his LM so much, and it sounds great in all his clips, but I just love how the RA sounds a little sweeter, yet still seems to cut perfectly fine for me.
 
It's a great thing that there are these variations available to suit us all.
I had Gruuv's axe for a bit and while it really is a gem it sure didn't suit me;)

Great to have choices, I say!
 
Now I see where the bell cover from my Atelier ended up.:smug:
Just kidding, I got the replacement from Fodera shop.
It`s all good....
If you ever decide to sell your RA5 just holler.
Yes and yes....
That bell cover is actually off my old Atelier Z M265 it fit perfectly with some double stick tape.It's off now as with the Jimmy's 21 fret necks it sits a touch closer to the neck heel and not as comfy as on my jazz basses.
Yes I have been using that GT6-B for years and when there programmed correctly can be incredible tools...Some gigs I take my pedal board to and others the GT.
 
I finally restrung my LM5 (pictured, acquired a couple of months ago) for the first time, and on the advice of some of the posts here I went with Hi Beams (.45-.125). I have to thank whoever it was that recommended them, 'cause they are great, and a perfect choice for the LM5 - grindy, yet with a degree of refinement, just the right tension, and they sound and feel good for fingerstyle and slapping. I use Lo Riders on some of my other basses, but I haven't used Hi Beams for many years, and I'm really glad I gave them a shot.
 

Attachments

  • LM5 body front.jpg
    LM5 body front.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 76
Status
Not open for further replies.