Chef
In Memoriam
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah this is exactly what happened to my neck:
![]()
I'm not sure if Jimmy is going to give up doing the bullet truss design on EVERY future LM but I know this isn't the first one he's had to repair like this and if he's more comfortable building with the heel-access truss he should just do it. I certainly don't care about "period correctness", I just want my Alleva to be indestructible. He already abandoned the awful 3 bolt neck joint thing so who cares?
Just to be clear, that's not a pic of a busted Alleva.
3 friggin bolts...now that was a bright idea
The idea was to make it easier to do something that would be essentially the same as shimming the neck for lower action. You didn't have to remove the neck and cut a card, and you only had to loosen three bolts instead of completely removing 4. It actually did work pretty well, and shimming is not really "weird" at all. Lots of valid cases for it.obviously the 3 bolt design could be done since it was....but the whole tilting thing was just weird to me. Never saw the reason for leaving the 4 bolt design which we know is super solid...
The idea was to make it easier to do something that would be essentially the same as shimming the neck for lower action. You didn't have to remove the neck and cut a card, and you only had to loosen three bolts instead of completely removing 4. It actually did work pretty well, and shimming is not really "weird" at all. Lots of valid cases for it.
FWIW.
Is shimming supposed to happen only after your truss is overextended and there's still bow going on? Or is it like a common thing to lower your action? I've always just relied on the truss rod and bridge saddles....
Yeah, it's not like it has to be done all the time... my main point was, it's not strange or weird (or crazy).Wow that sounds crazy. I've never had to do that on a single one of my instruments let alone any of my vintage fenders and I like my action VERY low!
Wow that sounds crazy. I've never had to do that on a single one of my instruments let alone any of my vintage fenders and I like my action VERY low!
Yeah this is exactly what happened to my neck:
![]()
I'm not sure if Jimmy is going to give up doing the bullet truss design on EVERY future LM but I know this isn't the first one he's had to repair like this and if he's more comfortable building with the heel-access truss he should just do it. I certainly don't care about "period correctness", I just want my Alleva to be indestructible. He already abandoned the awful 3 bolt neck joint thing so who cares?
On the subject of necks, does anyone know if these LM's ever went to the one piece thing (no separate fret board)... don't know how to tell with this binding...
that's for sure! "Period correctness" aside, the bullet truss just doesn't seem like as solid of a design compared to the heel joint ones. Especially after looking at those x-ray and "cut in half" pics....do we as Alleva users really need that later 70s detail for any reason other than period correct aesthetics? One could say the truss is easier to access but Jimmy can cut out a chunk in the pickguard and body for easy access, too so I don't really see the point if it has a higher chance of messing up the neck. Obviously IMHO.