Chef
In Memoriam
Just to keep whipping the well aged horse here...
*If* one were to "control plate" An LM5 for example...one would have to move the holes for the controls. The first vol control is too close to the p/g to get a standard control plate in there.
*Then,* would you want a standard three hole version for v/v/passive tone, and leave the AC's active t/b "unplated?"
Or, go to a 4 hole control plate, and stack them?
(and, I think having "standard, all in line controls" vs the current '3+2' used now would really detract from the inherent visual identity AC has due in part to the current scheme...you can look at any photo of an AC bass-and not see the headstock-but immediately recognise it from the control layout, ya dig?)
I dunno...I think they're just fine the way they are, and I'm very traditionalist.
*If* one were to "control plate" An LM5 for example...one would have to move the holes for the controls. The first vol control is too close to the p/g to get a standard control plate in there.
*Then,* would you want a standard three hole version for v/v/passive tone, and leave the AC's active t/b "unplated?"
Or, go to a 4 hole control plate, and stack them?
(and, I think having "standard, all in line controls" vs the current '3+2' used now would really detract from the inherent visual identity AC has due in part to the current scheme...you can look at any photo of an AC bass-and not see the headstock-but immediately recognise it from the control layout, ya dig?)
I dunno...I think they're just fine the way they are, and I'm very traditionalist.
