last time i was at the shop i played a couple of alder 5's and they were really light. maybe, barely 9 pounds. couldve been in the 8 pound range. hes doing a great job keeping the weight down on the lg's.
Thanks for the info...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
last time i was at the shop i played a couple of alder 5's and they were really light. maybe, barely 9 pounds. couldve been in the 8 pound range. hes doing a great job keeping the weight down on the lg's.
My LG is from NYC, and weighs 9lbs 3-4 oz.
I don't really want a 5 string a whole lot lighter than ~9 lbs, I think that starts impacting tone in weighs I don't like. YMMV, etc.

I've noticed that there are a couple different headstock shapes amongst the A-C basses. Some are more fat and some are more thin and pointy.
Was there a certain time that the headstock shape changed?
Are the current ones the fat ones or the pointier ones?
Is it an option to get one or the other?
Here's a picture of what I mean. Look at the two four strings on the right. I've seen this difference in five strings and between P and J style. What's with it?
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Here's another example:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
My LG5 is pretty much right at 9 pounds. IMHO, that's perfect.So, what are the Alder body 5's coming in at weight wise? I am really gassin for an LG...
Hey guys quick question..the basses Jimmy has at NAMM..are most of them spoken for "typically"...i am moving some stuff and im considering an used LM5 or checkin out what Jimmy will have at NAMM..im goin to try and call him tomorrow..just thought id ask around here first..
Thanks!
west*coast*bass, here's your mockup request:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
*CLICK ON IT TO MAKE IT BIGGER*
west*coast*bass, here's your mockup request:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
*CLICK ON IT TO MAKE IT BIGGER*
I've always liked the AC headstock. Reminds me of one of my faves:
![]()
Hey guys quick question..the basses Jimmy has at NAMM..are most of them spoken for "typically"...i am moving some stuff and im considering an used LM5 or checkin out what Jimmy will have at NAMM..im goin to try and call him tomorrow..just thought id ask around here first..
Thanks!
When I spoke to Jimmy last week he said that he definitely had some basses that were NOT spoken for that would be at NAMM. One of them sounded f'in smoking, but he wanted to keep it on the DL until it is revealed at NAMM. I think he said he had a number of 5's, mostly LM's.
Where are the RA5 cats out there besides Ken who has been clear and vocal and this subject and lets hear some first hand comparisons to LM's...

I'm really disappointed with the black beauty strings on the RA. I've learned that they are coated low riders in 45-105 makes a string that is not nearly as slap friendly as I hoped.They're also very compressed sounding. They look so freakin bad ass though.
![]()
Newest family pic.
![]()
The P is nitro alder/delbergia and is sporting GHS Stainless Steel precision flats = Happy thumpy w/ some sustain
The white J is nitro alder/indian. Ken Smith Compressors which are a nickel, ground wound 044 - .105 = awesome combo
The Sunburst is nitro delbergia/alder has Nickel Low riders 40-100 ,,,,to slinky. I will bump up to 45-105 youguys are right though I think that string with a couple of months on it will be great on this bass.
Black bass is Poly maple/alder has the BB 45-105. I will switch to Hi beams 45-105.
So I'm trying to get a nice progression of tones from thump to twang all while complementing the axes natural thing.