• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

I would have had binding put on this also if Roger would have offered. I am different, I love blocks and binding. I also wish I would have went with the upcharge on the BE Maple. ( so it would be more noticable.) But, I love this Bass and have played it @ a show just about every weekend for over a year and a half. Its a keeper.


SadowskyNYC.jpg
I love the look of your bass just the way it is.
+1

IMHO, going with a much busier BEM would be a bit much, and possibly detract from its looks in some ways. IMHO it's perfect the way it is.

I really love that bass! :cool: and I agree, BEM would be stellar on it too!
It's already BEM, he's just talking about paying extra to get a particularly highly figured piece instead of the one he got.
 
I would have had binding put on this also if Roger would have offered. I am different, I love blocks and binding. I also wish I would have went with the upcharge on the BE Maple. ( so it would be more noticable.) But, I love this Bass and have played it @ a show just about every weekend for over a year and a half. Its a keeper.


SadowskyNYC.jpg

This bass is gorgeous and perfect as is. No binding!
 
sadowsky_mv5_1.jpg


BTW, I played this one again a bunch this weekend and it just continues to deliver the damage on stage. D and G strings NEVER disappear on me in a bass line, and the B string is a force to be reckoned with. Have to remember to back the VTC off before slapping and popping... generally pretty explosive off this thing... the keyboard player commented. :)

Damn it's fun to own an MV5 with singles in it... y'know? :)