• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSN_3aHGthUcTdEZgR-1EczNNaJTzs_kuKWAEJaVMQcJ8xAb80i.jpg

How are we supposed to compete with that?


In that case you can pick from any of my basses if you'd like.

I'm with you... MY wife on the other hand would probably not allow this to occur, lol.

...Unless she cleans windows and baseboards... does she do that?
 
Firesalt said:
I'm with you... MY wife on the other hand would probably not allow this to occur, lol

...Unless she cleans windows and baseboards... does she do that?

If she cleans and does all the laundry, my wife might just go for it!!!! LOL!
 
NOLA Bass said:
If she cleans and does all the laundry, my wife might just go for it!!!! LOL!

At dinner with the wife. She just confirmed the second wife is fine and physical contact is allowed as long as she doesn't have to do laundry, clean the house or cook dinner!!!!
 
I was giving some thought to making my standard 5 into a vintage 5 with a pearliod pickgard and black control plate, what do you think?

Definitely not, the Standard is set apart from the sea of Fendowsky same-ness by going sans-pickguard and no control plate. A pickguard would only make it more common and that, my friend is a truly unique instrument. Excellent choice.

When I have the scratch, a standard Sadowsky fiver will be my next big acquisition. Got the Metro RV5PJ already with the pickguard etc.
 
Definitely not, the Standard is set apart from the sea of Fendowsky same-ness by going sans-pickguard and no control plate. A pickguard would only make it more common and that, my friend is a truly unique instrument. Excellent choice.

When I have the scratch, a standard Sadowsky fiver will be my next big acquisition. Got the Metro RV5PJ already with the pickguard etc.

Thanks, good point! :) All the best with your Sadowsky. :bassist:
 
Well it's pretty slow so I'll post some STUFF. :D
This is all about PJs, flats, & my striving to develop my overdub hobby. I've had a mission ever since I acquired my Sad' to figure out how to record flats on that baby. I think I got it figured out. (at least I got a satisfying start)
I hear flats in my head as strings that should have as appealing a tonal pallet as round wound strings - with obvious differences. It's just a big time problem to coax it out on a recording. I thought it was possible without EQing but the nature of recording insists that you manipulate the tracking. When someone tells you "Oh I just ran it straight into the board", it may come off as being a compromise. NOT SO! Recording Engineers are EXTREMELY talented at what they do, & have very elaborate tools to perform their magic. I now have a new respect for these artists.
I added the partner parametric EQ to my ME-1NV preamp in the chain & am attempting to study the ins & outs of making it work for me. Not an easy job.
I recorded a test run that I thought y'all might like to hear. It kinda ties in with our earlier discussion about PJ/JJ/P & how to perceive their nature when wishing to bring out the best in each.

This recording is done with the Sad' preamp bass set flat & treble @ 50% boost. (typical w/me to help the flats in my overdubs). I used a bit of soft knee compression to get it all "in line" as it were. When I have a better understanding of boosting preamp bass w/ EQ tweaking, I'll punch up some FAT! ;). This test is all about pure flat wound tone.
Each CD by a variety of artists has it's own unique tonal signature & the bass tone on an overdub "takes on" that character & can be limited by it UNLESS the bass track is EQ'd to avoid those limitations. Much the same as a live gig manipulation I suppose.
The Test song is just a 1 verse loop done 7 times, all different. I chose some low register to get a feel of the EQ'd flats on the low end.
Bear with me here: I had to do the changes on the fly without stopping.
***1-3 are what I like in the EQ set.
***4-6 are the same sets except the low band has been cut back to give a more vintage flat wound tone.
***7 is EQ bi-pass. By the nature of recording & the limitations of the overdub system, this does NOT sound like my bass when I play pre-recording. Just the same, that's a nice round tone.

1. = P pup favoured @ 0:00
2. = P pup soloed @ 1:03
3. = Detent @ 2:08

4. = P pup favoured @ 3:13
5. = P pup soloed @ 4:17
6. = Detent @ 5:22

7. = Detent w/EQ bi-pass @ 6:27

Edit: You can drag the slider to repeat any specific # (time).
You may wish to come back to this post while listening to ID the settings. I'll get this right eventually. :D
B.
Invalid Link Removed