I'm close to pulling the trigger on a Metro Express 5er. I'd like to get another Satin but for the extra $1k.
Anybody tell me if I can get the ME with single coil pu's?
I will be doing the same. I would like to change the HC in my Metro to SC.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm close to pulling the trigger on a Metro Express 5er. I'd like to get another Satin but for the extra $1k.
Anybody tell me if I can get the ME with single coil pu's?
I'm not completely clear on the difference between the two, other than when I favor either pu my Satin is quiet. I do like that.I will be doing the same. I would like to change the HC in my Metro to SC.
I'm, in general, a big SC fan (even on guitar) and not much of a fan of noiseless o HC versions because they never alone the same.I'm in the process of placing an order for a UV70. Wondering If anybody has done a Sadowsky HC vs SC comparison. I've only heard the HC pickups at this point.
___________
I found that one video by Soong—quite a difference—but I can't tell if they are the Duncan ones or the interim Nord ones.

On the subject of PJs, I had my WL5 modded to one by a great friend & talented luthier in Tokyo during a recent trip there. Picked up an Aguilar 60P-CL on TB to match the 18mm bridge & he cut out a new pickguard, routed the body & wired it up. We kept the stock SC bridge pickup in there for a try out & it was surprisingly balanced - Pickups soloed had punchy low-mids.
View attachment 3167153
View attachment 3167239 My 2 cents worth. I have 3 sadowskys .all hc pickups. Two of them sounded amazing. 1 of them not as good.so I decided to try the sc pickups on that one . The shop used the duncans. That one has become the best sounding one now.just my opinion of course
4) It is not much more work or cost to build a PJ over a pure P. so we feel that whatever it brings to the table is worth the addition of the J pickup. However, it MUST be a humcancelling pickup.
The one on the far rightJust out of curiosity, which one of the 3 was the one that had the pickups replaced?
I'm, in general, a big SC fan (even on guitar) and not much of a fan of noiseless o HC versions because they never alone the same.
I haven't tried the sadowsky SC, my UV70 is loaded with HC and man they deliver...
I'm sure in a side by side comparison the difference might be big but, honestly, the HC and amazing and give me everything I need. The key, for me, is on the VTC. It would let you dial what you are looking for in terms of a more modern or vintage sound.
As a matter of fact I'm considering swapping the SC on a Lakland 5 strings that I bought recently for a set of Sadowsky HC because those pickups sound to modern for me.
I think you'll be satisfied with the HC, I would give them a try if I was you (in fact I was and I did)
View attachment 3167239 My 2 cents worth. I have 3 sadowskys .all hc pickups. Two of them sounded amazing. 1 of them not as good.so I decided to try the sc pickups on that one . The shop used the duncans. That one has become the best sounding one now.just my opinion of course
How do the Dimarzio SCs compare to the Nordstrand SCs? (Sadowsky model)
Yes!Just for hum/noise?
I had an RV5 for a hot minute, but returned it cause I wanted a four string instead (the me of the 90's would never have expected that) and I wanted more of a 70's bass, hence the UV70 on order. So I have heard the HCs, recorded them in tests and got to terms with their kinda high-end sound. Also, my friend's UV70, which I had for a week, sounded terrific with HC pups. I did find that, in order to achieve a more "typical" jazz bass tone, you had to really work the VTC to get away from the high-endiness. Soong's video comparison sounded to me like there was drastically more mids in the SC pups as to sound like polar opposites. I'll probably start with the HCs, but getting a vintage tone is more work. That said, I didn't really love the SC tone in the video, so I was wondering which edition of the SC those were. Also, context matters; would love to hear the comparison in a track or two.
Dont get me wrong the bass sounded great with the original hc. Just not as great as the other two..the sc. Just took it to a level that Imho. Sounded more raw .closer to a jazz bass...the hc. Is what I would go with if I only could have oneI had an RV5 for a hot minute, but returned it cause I wanted a four string instead (the me of the 90's would never have expected that) and I wanted more of a 70's bass, hence the UV70 on order. So I have heard the HCs, recorded them in tests and got to terms with their kinda high-end sound. Also, my friend's UV70, which I had for a week, sounded terrific with HC pups. I did find that, in order to achieve a more "typical" jazz bass tone, you had to really work the VTC to get away from the high-endiness. Soong's video comparison sounded to me like there was drastically more mids in the SC pups as to sound like polar opposites. I'll probably start with the HCs, but getting a vintage tone is more work. That said, I didn't really love the SC tone in the video, so I was wondering which edition of the SC those were. Also, context matters; would love to hear the comparison in a track or two.
Funny how that works. Also nice to know you can bring an instrument back from the edge with a pickup swap.
Dont get me wrong the bass sounded great with the original hc. Just not as great as the other two..the sc. Just took it to a level that Imho. Sounded more raw .closer to a jazz bass...the hc. Is what I would go with if I only could have one