• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

I've got a question for the Sadowsky community that I can't seem to find a lot of info on. I even attempted to create a thread and never received a response on it unfortunately.

I'm considering a build with doing a reverse P and a J in the bridge. Of course a super PJ is what I ultimately want however has anyone here had experience comparing a reverse P to a J neck pickup? I consider myself a P guy through and through which is why I love my Verdine White but curious to see what others think on reverse P vs J.
FWIW, that Danish trio posted recently features a reverse PJ: .
 
I'm a big fan of reverse PJ - the only four strings I have are old Yamaha BB-2000 (fretted and fretless), and while I'd have preferred a VVT rather than VTToggle, they pretty much blow my mind for solid feel and tone - beautifully built and very satisfying instruments. I believe reverse P gives you more uniformity across the strings, and have pondered how cool a reverse P would be on a five-string. That said, I have not had a PJ 5 in the house for many years - generally dual soaps or j/double j.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmbass21
I've got a question for the Sadowsky community that I can't seem to find a lot of info on. I even attempted to create a thread and never received a response on it unfortunately.

I'm considering a build with doing a reverse P and a J in the bridge. Of course a super PJ is what I ultimately want however has anyone here had experience comparing a reverse P to a J neck pickup? I consider myself a P guy through and through which is why I love my Verdine White but curious to see what others think on reverse P vs J.

A reverse P by itself will always sound like a P. The place where you hear some difference is when both pickups are on together. Popping the G string sounds more like a J because, on the reverse P, the treble coil is where a J would be.
 
I consider reverse P soloed to be more "modern" than traditional P. That's mainly because you get a bit more growl to the low strings, a bit more depth to the DG strings.

Of course it's all relative, right? Those who prefer traditional P might say that on reverse P, the low strings sound thin in comparison, and the DG strings less punchy.

As usual it's a matter of "different", with better/worse being personal preference. FWIW I lean toward the traditional tone of standard P, but I also have reverse P in my collection and enjoy that too. I mainly use reverse for modern rock & metal, but whatever, I'll use either config for any genre.



As for PJ -- what Roger said. Reverse P sounds more J-like on the DG strings, standard P sounds more J-like on the BEA strings.
 
Thanks for the answers everyone. I should've just asked here from the get go. This definitely has helped me make a decision.

@kittywithabanjo I think I'm looking for something that has a similar focus to a J but still have some P heft in the tank. The only J that I've ever bonded with is my satin deluxe J. I love it but love the Verdine White tone more.

I've just never owned a reverse P and wondering if it's kind of a middle ground between the two. I've owned other basses over the years with soapbars and humbuckers but never loved their tone.
 
Thanks for the answers everyone. I should've just asked here from the get go. This definitely has helped me make a decision.

@kittywithabanjo I think I'm looking for something that has a similar focus to a J but still have some P heft in the tank. The only J that I've ever bonded with is my satin deluxe J. I love it but love the Verdine White tone more.

I've just never owned a reverse P and wondering if it's kind of a middle ground between the two. I've owned other basses over the years with soapbars and humbuckers but never loved their tone.
Check Roger's response above... I think he answered this.
 
To me, whichever strings are on the coil closer to the neck will have the exact sound I like best in a PJ that’s blended. So would I rather get the better sound from B E A or from D G? That’s an easy call for me. Also prefer where my thumb is supported on standard P. I tried a reverse PJ5 and now have standard. If you liked that more modern/tight/nasal combined sound on your low strings you’d go with reverse. If I wanted that sound I’d get an m5-24.

Very personal decisions just my $.02 on how I’ve experienced it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElMon and Joebone
^^^you need to buy this table now
40ABFE93-8760-4BEC-82BE-F0E1DAD6B493.jpeg
 

Latest posts