TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Looks like you might be a stingray guy as well. EB's slinkys will work just fine on your bass, and you can also try DR HiBeams.I don’t like the strings that came on my bass. The tension is too tight for me. This is the first time since I was young that my finger tips hurt.
Thanks -- more time to feed the piggy bank.I seem to recall Jason from FretNation saying in a Facebook post that they should be available in the US sometime this summer to early fall.
As of a couple of days ago that first 5-string ME Ultra Vintage P was on Reverb for sale. Made me really sad to find out that for right now they’re only being shipped with a 1 7/8” nut width, or I’d already have it.
EQ was flat on the Magellan and contour was about 10 o clock. Onboard EQ was both bass and treble at about 20% and tone rolled on at about 75%. I kept the EQ there for the gig and used the tone knob and p/u blend to dial in tone for different songs.Jjk sounds great. If you dont mind telling, what were your Magellan settings for this? Same as you stated in previous post? Thanks.
I use DR Lo Riders on all my other bassesLooks like you might be a stingray guy as well. EB's slinkys will work just fine on your bass, and you can also try DR HiBeams.
that's interesting because those are DR's stiffer strings... with the intent of allowing lower action (hence the name). i figured since you didn't like how stiff the blues were you'd be maybe more of a slinky kinda' guy. oh well. lol. btw lo-riders are my faves, but then again, i also really like sadowsky blues a lot too.I use DR Lo Riders on all my other basses
I prefer the MIJ basses. Something about the feel of them i just l Iike better. Others prefer the German basses. I doubt there is much difference in how they sound.Are the MIJ better than German? Something I've wondered about. I guess I'm about to find out.
I also noticed this change a while back, don't recall the exact year. I never asked Roger, but I assumed it was to further reduce the usual dead spots inherent to wood neck basses. If you may recall, over the years there have been several devices made to add mass to the headstock for this purpose, including some custom instruments using extra laminates, etc.I bought a new Sadowsky Modern 5 NYC last week. It's my second one.
...
Do you know why the new one has a thicker head?
Yes it does thanks. Especially your first paragraph.Hope this helps
The DR. LO RIDERS are stiff, but not as stiff, and they are smootherthat's interesting because those are DR's stiffer strings... with the intent of allowing lower action (hence the name). i figured since you didn't like how stiff the blues were you'd be maybe more of a slinky kinda' guy. oh well. lol. btw lo-riders are my faves, but then again, i also really like sadowsky blues a lot too.
it's not so much about the thickness of the headstock as it is the increased mass at that end of the neck that changes the resonant frequency of the neck itself, which is the real key to the puzzle. If you've ever seen those "fat fingers" which are literally just weights that clamp onto the headstock, it's the same idea.Yes it does thanks. Especially your first paragraph.
Could you tell me more about those dead spots? How come having a thicker headstock reduces the probability for dead spots?