• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

no, no, no, you are all wrong! It's Sadowsky + B E R G A N T I N O! silly...

+1 The man speaks the truth. :bassist:

Of course, Sadowsky + Epifani/EA/Glockenklang/Phil Jones/EBS/Genz-Benz/Aguilar/Orange/Trace Elliot/Yugo/Tabasco/Gucci all sounds pretty good, too. :D
 
+1 The man speaks the truth. :bassist:

Of course, Sadowsky + Epifani/EA/Glockenklang/Phil Jones/EBS/Genz-Benz/Aguilar/Orange/Trace Elliot/Yugo/Tabasco/Gucci all sounds pretty good, too. :D
Those withOUT a continual state of identity crisis still say Sadowsky+Epifani. ;) :D
:hiding:
 
My NYC that I just sent him....This one!

l_0ff9bd6f87fd0a587f4603bd572dfe42.jpg
[/IMG]

l_805f78f061273bfb20ba094370efbe13.jpg
[/IMG]

l_3cd5bb0f8007fc96d870762eeb61c677.jpg
[/IMG]

Thanks for the kind words SQUID I am really glad you are digging it!

Peace,

T
Those look like my pics Tom:smug: And you mean My bass!!!!:bassist:
 
Those withOUT a continual state of identity crisis still say Sadowsky+Epifani. ;) :D
:hiding:

Some people say a lot of things. It doesn't mean that they are right, though. ;)






Seriously, though, my point is that Sadowsky's just sound great, period, and they are amazingly consistent in this regard. So, if you have a rig that you are happy with, then in all likelihood, a Sadowsky through that rig should be quite satisfying.

But, all the really cool guys know that the only real choice is a Sadowsky bass through a Sadowsky rig. :cool:

Tom.
 
Some people say a lot of things. It doesn't mean that they are right, though. ;)
Yes it does. You're wrong, I'm right. Now go stand in the corner! LA LA LA LA LA... I CAN'T HEAR YOU... LA LA LA LA LA... ;) :D :D :D :D


Seriously, though, my point is that Sadowsky's just sound great, period, and they are amazingly consistent in this regard. So, if you have a rig that you are happy with, then in all likelihood, a Sadowsky through that rig should be quite satisfying.
BS set aside, I simply must agree. I hope I can find the right deal on a Sadowsky PJ5 someday, but in the mean time, my 24F just sounds damn good thru anything I plug it into. Believe that. :)
 
+1 The man speaks the truth. :bassist:

Of course, Sadowsky + Epifani/EA/Glockenklang/Phil Jones/EBS/Genz-Benz/Aguilar/Orange/Trace Elliot/Yugo/Tabasco/Gucci all sounds pretty good, too. :D

Again we disagree... those Gucci bags have way to much upper mids for the Sadowsky, and are soft in the lows... (I dig the gold hardware though), and the Yugo tends to rattle too much on the low notes. +1 to everything else though.
 
Again we disagree... those Gucci bags have way to much upper mids for the Sadowsky, and are soft in the lows... (I dig the gold hardware though), and the Yugo tends to rattle too much on the low notes. +1 to everything else though.

Ladies and Gentlemen......Once again let's hear it for the amazing ears of KJUNG!!!!


:hyper:


:D

Too funny!

Peace,

T
 
I think the UV is more in terms of feel, radius of the fingerboard, nitro paint, etc.

Depends on the UV goals. If it was pretty strictly feel (like Sean says), tonal, and/or aesthetic, then as long as they met those goals, construction methods don't matter. I'm thinking it's mainly feel and aesthetic, and then "somewhat" tonal... just because as Sadowskys, especially with preamps, they're still not going to ever sound totally like an older passive Fender.

I can appreciate that they will always sound different, although I guess with the VTC and single coils (be it Sads or Nords) they are going to sound close to that "classic" jazz pass sound - but I would a bit part of the "feel" of the ultra vintage bass would also be the weight that 60's and 70's Fenders had as well as the size. Having that "hefty chuck o'wood" in your hands is, IMO, part of the feel of a vintage bass as opposed to the modern more lighter "super jazz". That's why I was surpised to hear that the ultra vintage series are chambered. FWIW.
 
Hey guys! all this useless arguing about which rig is better with a Sadowsky reminds me of teenage kids bragging about their 'manhood' being longer:rollno:

By the way! My Sadowsky through my Read Purity preamp sound better than any of yours. :spit:

:D:D:D

Seriously now; since this is the Sadowsky club let's talk Sadowsky:

what new product would we like to see coming out of the Sadowsky shop? (A 5 string Hybrid is a fact, so that doesn't count)
I'd love to see an small amp following the same design philosophy than the Portabag: "It Takes A New Yorker To Design A Great small Amp". I am sure Roger’s idea of great, portable tone would be a winner (Roger, can you hear me?).
 
I can appreciate that they will always sound different, although I guess with the VTC and single coils (be it Sads or Nords) they are going to sound close to that "classic" jazz pass sound - but I would a bit part of the "feel" of the ultra vintage bass would also be the weight that 60's and 70's Fenders had as well as the size. Having that "hefty chuck o'wood" in your hands is, IMO, part of the feel of a vintage bass as opposed to the modern more lighter "super jazz". That's why I was surpised to hear that the ultra vintage series are chambered. FWIW.

I think I remember reading somewhere that they do not chamber the ash bodied Sadowsky's, just the alder. Am I wrong?