• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

IMG_1805.jpg
OH SNAP! NICE! :)
 
finally up , here is my Sadowsky modern 5 I bought new in 1999 , it has single coil pick ups and back then no vtc but it sounds amazing and always has , it is my go to bass for most of my music , gig's recording etc . im hoping to get a vintage 4 string soon , I need a club member # if anyone knows how to go about that , sorry , still working on getting the pictures up correctly , will get it soon

you are #267. welcome :)

it looks like a very nice bass, but hard to see on that tiny pic :hmm:
 
I had the great fortune of hearing Bart play that WL the other night. Bart was literally bouncing off the ceiling like a loose balloon he was so up! I can tell that bass just SMOKES! I've always loved Bart's tone with his PJ but I think this one even tops the PJ if that's possible. It was so full and clear. Bart plays in a 3-piece band and this bass just covered all of the bases. Pretty much perfect where I was standing.

Congrats on a very exceptional Sadowsky Bart. I know now that it was worth every minute of the wait.

Thanks Jerry!

We've got to get together sometime soon and compare new Sadowskys! :D

I'm loving the mid-boost on the WL for hard rock songs, but I'm thinking I might just dial it back a touch. It's so aggressive it's almost over the top.

lowb_2277: We don't gig up in Seattle, but I try to make it out to most local GTGs (had to miss the last one in Seattle though), so maybe you'll get to see it/hear it at one of them!

And thanks to all for your kind comments. I can't take my eyes or hands off it for long.
 
I'm loving the mid-boost on the WL for hard rock songs, but I'm thinking I might just dial it back a touch. It's so aggressive it's almost over the top.
This was also my experience. I left the frequency and Q the same (500W), but set the gain and boost such that it just added little bit of a bump. For me, that worked a lot better.
 
This was also my experience. I left the frequency and Q the same (500W), but set the gain and boost such that it just added little bit of a bump. For me, that worked a lot better.

Yeah, it comes from the shop set to maximum boost, which for me is too much. Kind of like the treble/bass boost on the original preamp -- a little is good, but I don't think I've ever turned up either boost past 30% at the very most.
 
Yeah, it comes from the shop set to maximum boost, which for me is too much. Kind of like the treble/bass boost on the original preamp -- a little is good, but I don't think I've ever turned up either boost past 30% at the very most.

I still can't imagine boosting anything on an ash/maple Sadowsky with singles (maybe 10% bass when slapping). I can see a slight mid boost at around 500 hz would be a positive for the more scooped HC pickups, but that circuit continues to make little sense to me with singles (which I understand is the Will Lee spec). With the singles, as you can hear on the clip I put up on YouTube a couple of days ago, a slight favoring of the bridge pickup just SLAMS the mid mids into the voicing of that bass.

Of course, given Will's technique and the amps, monitors he uses, etc., I'm sure it makes total sense for him. For the typical player... not so much IMO.

I guess that's why I never was much interested in these 'tribute' basses. IMO there!
 
I'm loving the mid-boost on the WL for hard rock songs, but I'm thinking I might just dial it back a touch. It's so aggressive it's almost over the top.

Most of the time, I play mine with the mid-boost off. But in situations where the mix gets really busy, it can definitely help punch you through. The variable gain option (in addition to the frequency and Q switches) is just killer, and really helps you fine tune this control. :cool:
 
Most of the time, I play mine with the mid-boost off. But in situations where the mix gets really busy, it can definitely help punch you through. The variable gain option (in addition to the frequency and Q switches) is just killer, and really helps you fine tune this control. :cool:

I can see that, although digging in close to the bridge with a slight blend toward the bridge pickup should get you to the same place IMO and IME.
 
I can see that, although digging in close to the bridge with a slight blend toward the bridge pickup should get you to the same place IMO and IME.

But I am philosophically opposed to playing over the bridge pickup and/or favoring the bridge pickup, so I'm glad to have this option. :smug:
 
I can see that, although digging in close to the bridge with a slight blend toward the bridge pickup should get you to the same place IMO and IME.
Some of the same results, but not the same sound.

I must say, initially, I was really in love with the mid circuit. Then, after spending a little time with it, at least at its default setting (which I personally feel is too extreme, and might pair better with HC pickups), I kinda' fell out of love with it. However, I then started tweaking it, and I have to say, after "mellowing it out" some, I really started to like it again. I still feel I'd not use it most of the time, but it really was quite usable and effective... I can definitely see the rock applicability.
 
Most of the time, I play mine with the mid-boost off. But in situations where the mix gets really busy, it can definitely help punch you through. The variable gain option (in addition to the frequency and Q switches) is just killer, and really helps you fine tune this control. :cool:

That's how I plan on using it. I used it on a couple songs on the first gig (I'd just gotten it that afternoon), but mostly left it off through three sets. I love the extra snarl for the hard rock, but I'm going to dial it back a fair bit.

I like to think of it as "the afterburner." :D Not something I'll use most of the time, but nice to have for a little more punch in spots. The accessability of it as a set-and-forget in/out switch is what makes it so useable. It's just a flick away for a little more oomph on the heavier rock we play (my band plays everything from the Beatles and Johnny Cash to the occasional Alice in Chains or RHCP song).

For me, it's a different tone than favoring the bridge.

I also think of it less as a "tribute" bass and more as the result of a collaboration between one of the best luthiers and one of the best bass players around. It's not like Roger came up with it just as a way to sell more basses or to have something for NAMM.