• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Club Sadowsky!!!

May I join this Club, please? Here's my new Sadowsky M5-24 in (I guess 59 Burst) with VTC.

Oh my Lord, what a Bass. I was completely blown away, as I played him (her) for the first Time. That is by far the best Bass I've played until now.

Roger, Well Done!!! You and your Basses have their Reputation rightly.

sxlogn.jpg


20ff0o7.jpg
 
I'm sure Sadowsky pickups would (and DO) sound great in other basses, and I'm also sure, other pickups would sound great in a Sadowsky, BUT, then I'd question why you got a Sadowsky if you didn't want that sound.

I decided to go Sadowsky for many reasons and I truly think my NJ4 Nordstrand equipped NYC J hasn't lost any of the Sadowsky character. But I agree that if you want that specific sound that Roger has in mind you ought to use his designed pickups.
 
I decided to go Sadowsky for many reasons and I truly think my NJ4 Nordstrand equipped NYC J hasn't lost any of the Sadowsky character. But I agree that if you want that specific sound that Roger has in mind you ought to use his designed pickups.
That makes perfect sense to me, but I think that's because the NJ4 is really close to what Roger has designed with anyway (so it makes sense that you still have the sound).

I guess I'm more speaking regarding other J pickup types... because there are SO many out there, and they vary a LOT in tone. Your point is well taken tho, because there's no doubt they're truly great basses no matter what preamp/pickups someone would have in there. To each their own (as always!).
 
That makes perfect sense to me, but I think that's because the NJ4 is really close to what Roger has designed with anyway (so it makes sense that you still have the sound).

I guess I'm more speaking regarding other J pickup types... because there are SO many out there, and they vary a LOT in tone. Your point is well taken tho, because there's no doubt they're truly great basses no matter what preamp/pickups someone would have in there. To each their own (as always!).

+1

Having said all that, there's no doubt that I will try a Sadowsky SC on my MV4. It's just that shipping it overseas makes it an unreasonable buy. I'll wait till I have someone I know visit the big apple.
BTW, I did try the NJ4's on the MV4 but didn't like it so much. They ring out much better with the chambered Ash/Morado NYC, to my ears.
 
BTW, I did try the NJ4's on the MV4 but didn't like it so much. They ring out much better with the chambered Ash/Morado NYC, to my ears.
Now this is VERY interesting to me.

I know I'm gonna' play around between the two HC sets on my (one and only) chambered JJ5, but this means I should definitely at least try the SCs in that bass as well and compare to my older non-chambered one. I don't have the morado board like you have, but I still think it'd be a good thing to try.
 
Now this is VERY interesting to me.

I know I'm gonna' play around between the two HC sets on my (one and only) chambered JJ5, but this means I should definitely at least try the SCs in that bass as well and compare to my older non-chambered one. I don't have the morado board like you have, but I still think it'd be a good thing to try.


Maybe it'll be more precise to say the NJ4's felt more balance-wild with the maple board while with the morado they're more compressed - behaving "better".
Although most here think that maple and morado are very close I feel they really differ from each other. The maple has a much stronger attack with a lot of bright snap. The morado has slower attack with a warmer, more balanced (dynamically) tone. Not rosewood but very different than maple.
So I think that the fretboard wood has a lot to do with my experience.

Also, my basses a 4's. Maybe that counts somehow...
 
Maybe it'll be more precise to say the NJ4's felt more balance-wild with the maple board while with the morado they're more compressed - behaving "better".
Although most here think that maple and morado are very close I feel they really differ from each other. The maple has a much stronger attack with a lot of bright snap. The morado has slower attack with a warmer, more balanced (dynamically) tone. Not rosewood but very different than maple.
So I think that the fretboard wood has a lot to do with my experience.

Also, my basses a 4's. Maybe that counts somehow...
I actually totally agree with you, and I think Roger would too. Seems to me he's commented that he believes fingerboard woods make a big difference on his basses, and I think he's commented on the diffs between morado and maple before, too.

I definitely feel morado has a bit of compression in that "gank" area where maple is clearly more aggressive... that "bright snap" you're talking about. Totally agreed. I'd also add that I think morado has a bit more going on in the high sizzle area... almost like ebony does in a way. In fact, I'd probably compare morado more to ebony in general terms than maple.

IMHO.
 

Latest posts