Not everybody likes/wants matching headstocks. An FSO with matching headstocks is a no-go for me.
I call BS. Everyone loves matching headstocks, even if they don't know it yet! lol

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Not everybody likes/wants matching headstocks. An FSO with matching headstocks is a no-go for me.

IDK. Rolled edges feel pretty nice. That has always seemed like an expensive “US” model feature.It's pretty disappointing. No tort pickguard on the precision? What the heck, Fender?
Its 50/50 for me, I like to see the wood grain on head stocks too.I call BS. Everyone loves matching headstocks, even if they don't know it yet! lol![]()
I don't care what its called, or even what it is, it Still looks 100x better than the "Pau Ferro" color(s).if you wikipedia " rosewood " you'll see that there are dozens of species that qualify...in the minds of a marketing team.
Squier Paranomal is where it’s at! So much crazy cool coming out of that wacky laboratory. Basses are great, but if you like electric guitars it’s exponentially more interesting. Quality is top notch too.
I call BS. Everyone loves matching headstocks, even if they don't know it yet! lol![]()
I agree with all this except I prefer pau ferro over rosewood. <ducks for cover> Especially on a fretless, rosewood is sort of a nonstarter if you play with roundwounds. See my earlier question about fretless J bass options in this new lineup.P’s and J’s are classics that are hard to go wrong with, which is why people want them and buy them. For the same reasons, Fender can’t make any drastic changes to them either. Every time Fender does try to introduce something new and different, like the Dimension or Meteora, hardly anyone is interested, and they get discontinued eventually.
Of course Fender sticks to what their customers want - why shouldn’t they? The new models are perfectly fine, and a reasonable - if slightly uneventful - refresh of the Player line. And at least we’ll now be spared all the whining about Pau Ferro fretboards.
As a founding member of the J neck P bass club, I wholeheartedly endorse a non-PJ stock option! I got the Sonic Bronco and it’s excellent.Blame the honeymoon phase but I really dig my new Squier Sonic Precision bass. Jazz neck, P bass body & pickup. The perfect combination. I never liked P/J bases in order to get something similar. The Squier Sonic P is great and a featherweight.
I’ve never minded pau ferro, and when the CITES restrictions came into effect, I felt it was a sensible alternative. But OMG, did people go on about it! I’m happy Fender switched back to rosewood for that alone.I agree with all this except I prefer pau ferro over rosewood. <ducks for cover> Especially on a fretless, rosewood is sort of a nonstarter if you play with roundwounds. See my earlier question about fretless J bass options in this new lineup.
There's a MIJ Hybrid Jazz model that has P/J config.They should have added a P/J to the Player II. I know the Player Plus is a P/J but its active and no tone control when in passive. I just want a passive P/J in the Player Series.
The problem is that Fender used very light Pau Ferro. I've seen much darker PF boards that look very nice.I’ve never minded pau ferro, and when the CITES restrictions came into effect, I felt it was a sensible alternative. But OMG, did people go on about it! I’m happy Fender switched back to rosewood for that alone.![]()
Luck of the draw, mine is pretty dark. Bad photo but you can see the color.The problem is that Fender used very light Pau Ferro. I've seen much darker PF boards that look very nice.