You know this how?Let's see the data to support this categorical assertion.
This is literally a whole thread on what a humungous mash-up of influences American Country music has become.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You know this how?Let's see the data to support this categorical assertion.
Well, somehow my post offended someone so I'll try to repeat it in a bland format:I very much agree with you. But... between 1670-ish (fleeing the Church of England) and 1900 (equally influential Sears Catalog) is a long time for Appalachian music to develop it's American "root ball" in "relative isolation".
You know this how?Let's see the data to support this categorical assertion.
Coming from a family that has called the southeast of Virginia home since the late 1600s - it was go English (English Protestant, acutely) or go home.
No argument, although today Virginia would be considered mid-Atlantic, not southern. Some few years a go a U of Alabama history prof published a book which posited that the earliest settlers of the northeast colonies were of Anglo-Saxon (English ) stock, whereas in the south it was Celtic (Scotch-Irish) stock. The principal difference between the two? The Celts liked to fight amongst themselves more.
Austin City Limits | 50 Years of Asleep at the Wheel: A Retrospective | PBSthose cats can swing. there is an 'austin city limits' retrospective on 'asleep at the wheel' out there somewhere. it's awesome to see and hear the musicianship ray benson assembled and presented through the decades.
Trad musicians can be serious hard-asses about upholding the standard, yes. As well we should be. If one should roll up & assert themselves on, for example a jazz session, and can't play time or doesn't comprehend the repertoire; there's no excuse to get indignant about being invited to lay out.Country musicians are a lot more open to diversity than the performers who stick to traditional folk music styles.
Pretty much bingo. Ralph Peer, who essentially created the market for country music saw it as a valuable commercial commodity and as such it has been largely tailored and marketed as such since it's inception.[Country Music] right now heavily bent to meet the tastes of current paying consumers of it. (Just like the rest of music and art is). It's not really very relevant to the OP's proposed discussion, IMO.
Getting close to splitting hairs here.Not to dismiss your point, but the Ulster Scotts who populated Appalachia and brought their traditions and instruments with them had a lot of time to settle in relative isolation before any African, Creole, French, and Spanish influences arrived to be incorporated into the music.
Je suis d'accord. Sans the poverty porn re: "The Celts liked to fight amongst themselves more"No argument, although today Virginia would be considered mid-Atlantic, not southern. Some few years a go a U of Alabama history prof published a book which posited that the earliest settlers of the northeast colonies were of Anglo-Saxon (English ) stock, whereas in the south it was Celtic (Scotch-Irish) stock. The principal difference between the two? The Celts liked to fight amongst themselves more.
I don’t know about scotch, but whiskey pops up in country a lot.
True. It just needs more pickup trucks, tight jeans beer and scotch.
It bothers me that Boston Celtics pronounce the word incorrectly.

bin bothering me for Well over half a century…
dammit!
Now ya made me think of them again.![]()