• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Curt Mangan Monel Strings in Prime Number Gauges

Last edited:
Thoughts?
Gauges (assuming tolerances are super-tight, which remains to be seen) are the outside, not the essence: what counts is internal construction. A .085" may be differ substantially from another, in core-to-wrap ratio and other factors.

But, most importantly: prime numbers...of what? These primes are taken from the decimal (centesimal) part of a measurement in inches: re-measure in millimetres and primes go out the window.

This is like the nonsense about 432 Hz being allegedly linked to the vibrational Invalid Link Removed / universe / my butt.
As noted in the link, amongst other, perhaps more egregious objections, here too we have a measurement-related optical illusion. Namely, "Hertz" = cycles per *second*, and how long the "second" lasts is a totally arbitrary unit of time from the point of view of an indifferent universe: IIRC, one founded on Chaldean astronomy and base-12 arithmetics, in turn originally developed from the number of finger bones we happen to have (minus the thumb, which was used to touch them during calculations).

tl;dr - what bholder said.
 
I kinda liked the gauges, until I looked up the density of Monel. It’s more dense than steel, which I think disqualifies these as potential strings for me.

I do applaud the idea of getting away from .005” multiples - especially at the lower end of string gauges, where the tension jumps are pretty big. I’d love a good .038” G string.

If we want to use math to derive string gauges, the proper way to do it is a geometric progression - a musical fourth is a ratio of 1.33 in frequency, and it turns out (there’s a square and a square root in the math that cancel) that’s also the diameter ratio that makes sense for a balanced tension string set. A 40 G matches a 53 D in tension, for example. That step is the one that’s most out of whack in a typical arithmetic progression (add 20 per string) 40-60-80-100 set
 
Last edited:
No, I mean a set is typically in some differences of fives or tens because we like our base ten number system.
Oh. OK. It should be noted that often the gauges on the package are nominal. The famous Rotosound set used to be labeled something like 46-63-80-102 and it's now labeled as 45-65-80-105 but people here who say they've measured the strings say they're still the same as the old diameters.
 
Too bad they’re spouting this nonsense, because they do make good strings. I’ve had nickel rounds from them on both basses and guitars, and their quality (and customer service) really should speak for themselves. Also: I selected my own gauges when ordering from them, choosing my gauges by consulting available string tension calculators :laugh:
 
Sherman Potterism: Horse hockey!:rollno:

Good ol' Col. Potter!

Horse Hockey.jpg