I don't think anyone has forgotten where we are. There is simply a whole lot of subjectivity to the issues involved. "What ethically gets passed along from teacher to student" is a prime example. I have a great colleague that I work with who is a wonderful bass pedagogue with 24 years professional orchestra experience. He plays beautifully with collapsed fingers in TP, and so do his students. Should he be censured because he doesn't toe the party line in the estimation of someone who finds this aspect of his teaching "unethical"? I happen to know who several of his teachers are/were, and the names don't get much higher up the ladder than these folks. Should they be censured for letting him develop his playing in the way he has?
The point of the pedagogy forum, as far as I know, is for teachers to share their beliefs and practices in a common space and let the reader take it all in and make up their own minds. And that's exactly what we are doing IMO. Nowhere does any rule read that teachers all need to agree or that the answer must always be a binary right/wrong/black/white.
Well, we know Rabbath teaches it. I think my point is important because it is talkbass and as always people are looking for shortcuts, validation for bad habits and excuses. Just like the massive difference between legit four-finger methods and bass guitar techniques what you describe above is not the same as a beginner not being able to arch their fingers and leaving at that.
Another point is that improvisors of any kind can't always look to those playing fixed music for the most stable technique - the classical players actually have more leeway in what fingering systems they can use because they can make decisions about it long before the fact.
Last edited: