BTW, I just clicked on your custom bass link for the first time - and wow, they look very nice, no wonder your new Starlliner 215 is built so nice - you’re a real craftsmen!!!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
a long shelf port would give it more port area but again, i think if they tuned it to 45Hz, the cab should sound the same as mine.
.......... if i used 6" ports, they'd have overlapped the speakers.
I know some people don't like this as an alternative, but what about putting 6" ports in the back of the cab? Perhaps the very lower bottom corners?
There isn't, if your input into the cab doesn't require it. But there is if you are using higher power amps that can drive the woofers to full excursion and the signal has appreciable LF content. In these cases, it's not just about chuffing either - the cab impedance and tuning can actually begin wandering.EDIT: besides, there doesn't seem to be any reason for more Starliner 215 port area.
John, what happens when you drive the Starliner 215 with some high power - any chuffing?
Hmm, the Starliner 215 has 8 inches of port area now - how much port area would be best?
the funny thing is, with all of this port tuning discussion, is that while i had the grill off yesterday, i ran it again as a sealed cab with some port blockers, and i think i actually like it better that way. even though eminece says that you're not supposed to run 3015's in a sealed cab, i like the way that it tightened up the low end and made it feel more immediate and punchy. they'll add a full pound to the weight of the cab, but i have a feeling that i might run it that way for a while.