Back on topic.
It looks like there's a slight angle between the necks? Good idea if so.
Yes there is, also the spacing of the necks and the obvious advantage (to me) , of having the guitar neck on top makes it pretty comfortable to play.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Back on topic.
It looks like there's a slight angle between the necks? Good idea if so.
To continue with some preliminary pictures of the bass, the fingerboard removal was the first thing that was addressed. It did come of rather easily with no damage to the neck and the truss rods were intact. I know that the one he did prior to mine, the owner wasn't concerned with matching the board woods and when I saw photos, it was pretty noticeable. Since I wanted a completely different wood anyway , I knew they'd be matched.
View attachment 545619 View attachment 545620 View attachment 545621 View attachment 545622 View attachment 545623
Fire away!
I am enjoying this thoroughly!
Taking off the remainder of the upper bout.
, then I was all I'm sorry, but putting that Rickenbacher plate on the headstock of the guitar is just wrong. I read your post, I know you said you don't care...a lot of the rest of us do care, it's wrong.
Oh, forgot to ask. Did you ever get an explanation on why the original Jetglow finish was soooo cracked?
Not that it matters anymore.
I know you said a lot of you do care, but you're wrong. If he doesn't sell it off as an original Rick, and doesn't go around claiming it to be one, what's the issue? You don't lose money, he doesn't lose/gain money, nobody is cheated out of anything but snobs being cheated out of their absolutely irrelevant 'purity'. If someone does care, i'm sure he'll let them know that it's not the real deal.
If I change pickups on a Rick/Fender/Gibby, i'm not going to get rid of the decal of said company for the sake of people who want to see and know exactly what it is that I'M playing and whether or not it's as it came from the factory. If people care, they will ask, if not, they won't need to be a snob about it. Why do you feel the need to bring someone down about the way that they present their instruments if it's not in any way cheating anyone?
Thanks Duke for telling it like it is ....I said I wouldn't address posts like this but since yours was positive I will take this opportunity to explain my views on it. "Whoever" can disagree or argue any point they like but I won't entertain it....my explanations will be stated here once. I didn't post this thread as discussion on "purist morals" of the Rickenbacker faithful and I won't let it turn into that. It is for people interested in these instruments and the build and decision making process that went into it. It wasn't built to offend anyone, it was built for a specific need for me as a musician...that is who the instrument will serve.
#1. ANYONE who knows ANYTHING about a Rickenbacker double neck would KNOW that this does not replicate ANY instrument originally produced by Rickenbacker so it is obviously NOT a 4080.
#2. I am not Claiming it to be one OR Calling it one.
#3. The bass side IS a Rickenbacker 4001 AND all of the parts except the bridge and tuners are as well. Many people change those out on original Rickenbacker products and that doesn't change the fact that they are STILL Rickenbacker products.
#4. I have no intention of selling this instrument, I realize the future can't be predicted but I would NEVER sell it as a Rickenbacker branded instrument,I would be honest as to it's origin. Also refer to point #1.
#5. It has the luthiers own serial number on it designating it as his build.
#6.I have an actual need for this instrument , I am a player , not a collector , the instrument needed to be customized to MY specifications...try asking Rickenbacker to do that for you....good luck. I inquired several times . They wouldn't even do a white finish for me when I asked them on several occasions years ago. They told me that white was too difficult a color for them to do now...(ever here of such a thing???) THEN they came out with the limited snowglo edition several years later...and I own two. If Rickenbacker would've make it , I would've bought it ...that is not the case so I had to go elsewhere to fulfill my specific needs.
#7. The name of the thread is "Custom Rutherford Double Neck Build" which is exactly what it is.
My intent is not to offend anyone, just to have the instrument that I need to have.
)!Sorry for bringing up the old argument, just didn't want to have someone bashing someone else for not also being a brand-nazi when it's clearly just a thread to showcase a beautiful axe. Looks like a killer instrument, have fun gigging with it (before you need a back operation)!