Congratulations Ba$$ ! That looks like you got one of the early Korean re-issues , some say they're the best of the batches .
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's definitely Korean - they're the only new ones that ever came in that colour and almost all the ones since have either been "pro" or had the pointer knobs.Congratulations Ba$$ ! That looks like you got one of the early Korean re-issues , some say they're the best of the batches .
Lighting isn't great, but... Welcome to the fam, sweet Dani!
Link Removed
The 63 short horn was my first bass. I bought it new in 63. I gigged with it for almost 5 years before I could afford a Fender Precision.I have a Danelectro Dano 63 short scale bass. It is a very cool retro looking and sounding bass, especially for the money.
That looks like a 2006 in gold bullion finish. Here's the page from the 2006 catalog:
Invalid Link Removed
The metal bridge saddles and lack of concentric pots are a dead giveaway.![]()
I've been looking, hoping to come across one at some point. Kinda hate to just go buy a brand new one when I know that sooner or later a used one is gonna pop up at a decent enough price that it would be worth upgrading with better tuners and bridge. If I could find a NOS Pro model that would be good too, I've been digging around and they just don't seem to be out there. Didn't ask the guy at Fort Madison Guitars about that though, might be worth another phone call. Although he did tell me to wait until the end of the year if I were going to buy one, I think on the assumption that they'll take over the company and things will be changing after they do. The money really isn't the issue for me, it's about the VALUE for $$$ spent especially since these are such odd duck basses anyway. I just really want one.
You are right that that's the third version - but those did not have tape. They thought they'd "update" the look (and save some money in the process) by making only black necks and no tape.I think that's the third version . It would have originally had the tape . Not sure about the colours they were offered in .
First off, I think nostalgia is playing with you. The originals were pretty bad.The 63 short horn was my first bass. I bought it new in 63. I gigged with it for almost 5 years before I could afford a Fender Precision.
I have played the newer line and have wondered how they could take a cheap piece of crap and make it even crappier. The old ones were much better. I didn't dislike mine because it was the only bass I had and I enjoyed it.
First off, I think nostalgia is playing with you. The originals were pretty bad.
But the new ones are at least as good, not worse. The only ones that come close are the Chinese ones and the only "downgrade" is the crap hardware which was made of very soft metal.
The Korean ones are the best of ALL the things marked Danelectro. You'v just become accustomed to how "sturdy" a Fender feels in your hand and after that Danos feel extremely chincey.
Once you get accustomed to them, they are awesome instruments and the good ones (again the MIKs) are quite good instruments by any standard, finish (better than the originals), playability (better than the originals) adjustable necks (which the original did not have) and essentially equivalent hardware (even tie there).
As a lifetime Fender fan I can say this without being a troll - I DARE you to find a Fender of any era that has a piece of rosewood as thick as either the originals or the MIKs.
First off, I think nostalgia is playing with you. The originals were pretty bad.
But the new ones are at least as good, not worse. The only ones that come close are the Chinese ones and the only "downgrade" is the crap hardware which was made of very soft metal.
The Korean ones are the best of ALL the things marked Danelectro. You'v just become accustomed to how "sturdy" a Fender feels in your hand and after that Danos feel extremely chincey.
Once you get accustomed to them, they are awesome instruments and the good ones (again the MIKs) are quite good instruments by any standard, finish (better than the originals), playability (better than the originals) adjustable necks (which the original did not have) and essentially equivalent hardware (even tie there).
As a lifetime Fender fan I can say this without being a troll - I DARE you to find a Fender of any era that has a piece of rosewood as thick as either the originals or the MIKs.
I seem to find pro models pretty easy. The issue is though is they are never listed as pro so your might have to sift through a bunch of adds until you find one. I have owned 5 long horns and 1 was a pro and honestly preferred the non pro better but thats just me
I have been trying to find our more about my Dano Longhorn as I am not the original owner. I haven't been able to find another example of a solid copper bodied Longhorn which also does not have the tape on the sides. The head stock and the back of the neck are painted a solid gloss black. This finish is excellent but I'm beginning to wonder if I may have purchased a refin. I'm hoping maybe someone here on could confirm.
![]()
If you happen across another one ping me please. I'm looking...
I had a black MIK Longhorn with a black neck and headstock. I've never seen that color combination, nor have I ever seen a solid copper Longhorn RI body.
I know the tape comes off the early RIs fairly easily and the finish underneath the tape is as good as elsewhere on the bass. I removed the tape from a couple with damaged tape and I didn't see a need for the crappy vinyl tape since the finish was so good underneath.