Well that's just me. I'm not really into solo bass (with the odd exception). What Michael Manring does is still very much about playing compositions though, so it's very different from creating demonstration content of the sort that Davie does. Manring is definitely an artist. Davie - at least based on the Youtube content of his that I've seen - is not. That's not to say there isn't any merit to what Davie does, it's just that it is likely to appeal to people for a different reason. Or maybe not. I can't say for sure what others are getting out of a performance on an instrument. I just know what I like and I can imagine there are others who have similar feelings to me on this particular subject.
That's fair, although I will add that this probably wasn't Davies free choice - the world seems to be gravitating more and more towards the short-clips nature and I believe this has been introduced with strong popularity of social media such as Vine and TikTok (and others).
The songs have become ever shorter, though lately it does seem to stick around a 3 min mark for radio edits. But social media is different, no one watches a musician for 3 minutes straight (broad public), but they will absolutely snatch a 15 second snapshot of someone shredding the hell out of their instrument. It's entertainment so I believe your description is fair enough, Dave is not considered an "artist" but more of an "entertainer". Even though, ironically, the definition of an artist is a "person that creates something". Originally it was meant to describe someone who is creating a drawing or a painting, and sure enough, entertainers and 10 second video makers indeed also "create". The discussion is up for grabs
Edit: Another thing just came to mind - the word definitions nowadays do seem to imply that we've started to define them too broadly perhaps. For example, people nowadays will claim to be doing something "professionally" because they are doing it to make a living, while the word profession itself means to be actually a complete master (meaning, having a degree on the subject, MA or higher) of a certain skill/field. An artist therefore could be considered as someone who is creating intelligent and complex pieces and is also able to reproduce them live, but isn't there a word "high art" for that?
I need to go check the definitions again, I kinda managed to hype myself, lol.
Last edited: