how come soundmen never tell guitarists that the mic'ed tone of their amp sounds nothing like the sound of the amp itself?
Excellent point!!! Hmm.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
how come soundmen never tell guitarists that the mic'ed tone of their amp sounds nothing like the sound of the amp itself?
Yeah, that clown would be me, and my grip is fine.
I've done enough gigs to see what I'm talking about many, many times. There are good soundmen out there to be sure but ones who are willing to give the bass any more time than plug in/play a few notes/ok, good lets go..as opposed to the time they will spend on just about anything else...those guys are rare.
A DI isn't necessarily a good or bad route, but it is not presumptively correct and regardless I should get the same amount of time and consideration that a guitarist gets, which is usually some discussion and interchange about what kind of tone he wants and often the soundman coming up on stage to hear his rig and understand what the guitarist is going for.
Try doing that as a bassist and see the response you get (I have). It's generally that you're being "difficult"...yes, I would call that lazy.
I don't disagree with this, but this is true of all instruments and all sources. Only with bass do you get excuses like "It needs to be DI in case his amp goes down" (what about the guitarist?) or "Your rig is not going to sound the same with a mic as it does to you" (that's true of all rigs and all mics)By the time the venue's acoustics have perturbed my sound on its way to the guy running the board, he has little or no idea of what my sound preferences are, and has little chance to reproduce it: laziness comes into play when he presumes what my bass should sound like, instead of walking on stage, listening to my rig first-hand, and trying to reproduce "my sound" throughout the venue. That said, all bets are off if my on-stage volume or EQ overwhelm the room - there's little that can be done from FOH if I'm foolish enough to create uncontrollable LF standing waves or raise the noise floor beyond common sense levels.
I don't disagree with this, but this is true of all instruments and all sources. Only with bass do you get excuses like "It needs to be DI in case his amp goes down" (what about the guitarist?) or "Your rig is not going to sound the same with a mic as it does to you" (that's true of all rigs and all mics)
What I'm getting at is the general tendency of soundmen (and musicians in general) to treat the bass as if it's some sort of necessary evil that they just want to get out of the way.
A few questions to ask.
1) Does what I want my tone to be matter?
If no, why not? And as a follow-up why does the guitarists desire for his tone matter and not mine?
If yes, 2) How is the soundman to have any idea what that is if he does not come up and hear my rig? If he just hands me a DI, then by definition it's going to be the tone he thinks is "correct".
The justifications for this could just as easily apply to guitar or even moreso an organ with a leslie which can produce every bit as much low end as bass (and be just as tricky) but of course must be miced because that's part of the sound. No one ever questions that, and soundmen will always accommodate.
This is not true with bass, and the real reason is [it's] a double standard.
hence the suggestion to do whatever it takes to get "your" tone into that box! (or at least into that cable if you bring your own mic.)If yes, 2) How is the soundman to have any idea what that is if he does not come up and hear my rig? If he just hands me a DI, then by definition it's going to be the tone he thinks is "correct".
i know the guy behind the desk will do his best to have me slamming in the mix.
I agree, but unfortunately the vast majority of soundmen I've dealt with (not just in this area either) seem to have the attitude that it must be free of any coloration and that's the only way they can get it to sound "right" in the house (which by definition means their idea of "right").hence the suggestion to do whatever it takes to get "your" tone into that box!
Yeah, I actually skimmed through your post too quickly (my bad) to really fully absorb before responding.I think we're in agreement, Marcus.![]()
Hi.
WOW, I never thought You guys have it so bad. Being surrounded with incompetent and lazy employees.
After all it is You, personally or the band, who pays the soundperson to do his job, right?
If I pay someone to do something for me, it's me, no-one else, who tells them how it should be done and how IT IS done. Otherwise it's bye bye. And if the work they've "done" puts me in a bad light, I won't pay them fully either.
I truly feel sorry about the state of the professionalism over there, I really do.
Regards
Sam
If only it were that simple. When I went out and bought myself a $350 mic to mic my cab, I thought the same thing you did. And by and large, that's what happened. But for every 4 gigs I did that were problem-free, there was one where the soundman was completely dicky about my $350 mic because he wanted my signal to be what HE wanted, not what I wanted. I even had a dude totally trick me and asked me if he could run a DI along with my mic, and me not wanting to be difficult, I said OK, then he shut my mic off for the show. Still burns my ass up to think about it!hence the suggestion to do whatever it takes to get "your" tone into that box! (or at least into that cable if you bring your own mic.)
hell, even as a guitar player, i have my own mic, placed where i want it, and on the (rare for me in small club-land) occasion where i'm not also doing the sound, the guy gets what i want to give him, and that's it.
being able to say "just give me a mic cable, i've got it from there" will make most good soundmen think you have your s**t together and trust you, and most bad soundmen happy to not pay attention to you anymore.
with out bands to mix, the sound guys out of a job, so think about that.
and we get screwed by not getting paid and having to sell 300 dollars worth of tickets to pay the sound guy. so yes we did pay him.

thats naive. either that or you're filthy rich and the sound guys do exactly as you say.
Two completely unrelated subjects, Sam, except for the fact that they raised the money to pay the guy by selling tickets and drawing people into the club. Regardless of your opinion of pay to play, that makes them the draw, which means they should get what they want in a mix.
Thats an ignorant statement.Well if you ever get far enough up the foodchain to get a gaurantee then you can start dictating terms to the soundman. Until then you are SOL.
with out bands to mix, the sound guys out of a job, so think about that. and we get screwed by not getting paid and having to sell 300 dollars worth of tickets to pay the sound guy. so yes we did pay him.
Thats an ignorant statement.
He is perfectly free to run any board or cabs he wants, but the delivery system is mine. Last time we had this argument, it was a mic. I'm now back on a DI for the most part, but I bring my own. I pretty much have to since I run a speaker DI on an SVT for most gigs now. I've decided I like the speaker DI sound enough to not worry about the mic anymore, but I'm using my own DI and that's that.