• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

DI vs Mic, you really want a 57??? Really???

As a bass player and sound man...I ask some questions and state my opinion. I hope this is helpful. (p.s. I used 4 mics, 2 DIs and 2 cabs to record for the last song I recorded. I love mics as much as anyone.)

I propose that if your goal is to have the band sound good in most situations(With a good PA) you will want to: Use a DI(I like transformer coupled DIs:D), turn down as much as possible to avoid bleed into other mics, have your cab pointing at you and at ear level or tilted back, and let the monitors carry you.

Check out the freq response on this mic...do you want your tone to go through this EQ before it hits the house?

SM57Chart.gif


Grab your graphic EQ and boost 5 dB at 5k-6k and drop 5 dB at 100hZ. Then drop 10dB at 50hZ. what kind of sound do you get? That is kind of what a 57 will sound like.

Do you really think a 57, Beta 52, or pick a random cheap mic(Mics walk off, no need to have $500 mics at a venue) is going to be used on your cab is going to capture that feel of your cab? Can you tell the sound guy if an on axis or off axis placement will work better? Can you tell the sound guy if you want the mic in the center of the dust cover or at the edge of the speaker cone?

If you are in a club with a good system, please turn down and use a DI. If you have invested in a mic hat you like the sound of, from experience and not from a forum suggestion, please present that to your soundman with an idea where where you like it mic'd. Maybe even get an audix cab grabber and have the mic set up for him. Help him help you.

A soundmans' life is not easy, and there are many things that are higher in priority than the effects of a 57 capturing your tone. How much bleed are the bass, drums, and guitars giving to the vocal mics?Riding the fader as your guitar player hits the wrong pedal and does permanent damage to the front row. Adding a delay to the vocal(Who has not effects/rig on stage and is really usually 40% of why anyone listens) at the right time. Getting bands on and off so the night does not go 1 hour too long for the headliner who everyone came to see. Are all the cables out of the way so the band does not trip as they entertain. How does your bass sound through their subs? What is the master EQ like in the club? Is it set up for a reggie band, or thrash metal with no subs? Are the drum overheads working at all on this kit? The drummer has 2 snares? where does that kick, who has no DI, like its mic? What sound does the band want?



In short, I know it is really important to me as a bass player to get my tone out there. I payed $700 for a cab, I want to know that is not wasted money. In the big picture micing a cab is just not the best option for a channel or a sound mans time a large percentage of the time.

Best of luck. Please, other sound men speak up. If I am wrong here, let me know.
 
Yes I do, and I want it positioned just like the Marshall in your photo ;)

OK, say you have a bassist who used to be a lead guitarist so is used to being babied by a sound tech & insists (not with 'team player bassist' insistence but with 'childishly petulant lead guitarist' insistence) on his cab being mic'ed. What's your mic of choice & positioning of same?
 
I use a DI.

I'm also a soundguy, and despise SM57's for a multiplicity of reasons. They're old sounding (which may be fine, depending on application of course), not durable, they have inconsistent QC, those plastic caps break when your drummer nails 'em, I could go on.

I prefer an Audix i5 for applications the '57 used to handle in the eighties. On the RARE occasions I'm asked to mic a bass cab, I like a Sennheiser MD421 or EV RE-20, dead center on a speaker cone unless the rig's highs are cranked.

Again, I frickin' hate the SM57! That doesn't stop other people from getting acceptable (though not stellar) mixes using them for bass, though.
 
Check out the freq response on this mic...do you want your tone to go through this EQ before it hits the house?

Well if the house has the typical two or four double eighteen subs and a sound guy that likes the big boom...yes.

The corner is a little on the high side but, there's still plenty of fat to be had there.

What you see there is an old school Motown sounding bass EQ.

IMHO
 
Ideally I prefer both a tranny'd DI and a 57. I know the 57 on paper isnt the best mic. I have mics in my studio worth more than all of my basses but there is a mojo about it.

On paper there are "better" basses than a P-bass. But yet it remains one of the most popular basses. . . sometimes "better" isn't "right".

the most important lesson I've learned, gear wise (and I still have a hard time w/ it), is a gears cost, status, looks, ubiquitousness etc dont mean nearly as much as your ears.

oddly it was the 57 that taught me that when having a VERY hard time mic'ing a guitar in the studio once. I threw all sorts of money at it. didnt like it. wanted to lay a scratch down one afternoon and didnt want to fuss, threw up the 57 cuz it was easy (and lying right in front of me) and I was floored. It sounded better than my Wunder CM7. Sometimes stuff just works (wow, did I just say that?:D)
 
Meh, I just plugged that curve into Audacity and noodled. It ain't that bad at all. It's certainly usable and a lot better than it looks on paper. I've heard lots worse.

IMHO
 
Truthfully, the best FOH sound I've ever obtained(as a bassist) was with a blend of a Beta57 and a post-EQ DI signal... I also run sound, and totally realize the potential pitfalls of running post-EQ DI, but I get a warmer, punchier sound that way... I also make a point of letting the soundguy know that I won't be twiddling knobs all night, and tend to run my amp fairly flat - any changes I need to make after soundcheck will be with Master volume, so I'm not dicking him around all night...

Simple bar gig - I just DI and call it good...

Regarding mic choices - I know plenty of sound guys that like to use a D-112, but I think they suck for bass... If given a choice between a D-112, sm57, or DI only - I'm taking the DI...


- georgestrings
 
I am not a fan of the D112 live, I have a lot of various mics that I might experiment with if I find the need to mic. A few that work well with some rigs are the 57, 58, beta 57, B-52, ATM-25, 421, 604, 609, CAD C95 (especially a cello or upright), CAD E-100 (w/ variable HPF).

Fpor some applications, especially where there's a lot of low end mud and the bass player just must have a mic on their amp because otherwise they might soil their panties, I might very well go with a 57.
 
i prefer the 58 slightly over the 57. with all the slagging that people do on 57's and 58's, there's still way more 57's and 58's on pro stages all over the world than any other mic on earth. i can't think of but maybe a handful of gigs in my life where the 57 and 58 weren't all over the stage. i also can't think of many major shows where you don't see 57's and 58's. pretty good for a mic that supposedly sucks.

anyway, if you combine a di with a 57 or 58, you will get a great tone that will give you anything you need. if you want the lows the mic doesn't have, you have the di, and then you have the sound of the amp in the mic giving it some character. it's an often-used low budget solution for people who like to mic amps but don't want to lose low end. you can't make that sound good, you probably should take some mixing lessons.
 
The 57 is, among other things, a great example of why one should perhaps place a bit less stock in charts and graphs sometimes.

Imagine this, you have just arrived from the planet Mongo. You need to mix a live band using only Earth microphones that you have never heard. You are allowed to make selections based only on frequency response graphs and polar plots.

In that situation I can't imagine reaching for the 57 on anything. Maybe snare or glockenspiel or something. Thing is, the SM57 sounds pretty darn good on a lot of stuff, passable on even more and downright awful on practically nothing. They are also real cheap, take high SPL, and have plenty of output for most sources. In terms of use on a bass amp I think you might be over estimating how much information is really there at 5k to be boosted, and you are perhaps underestimating how much of that low end you get back with proximity effect.

I own like a dozen of the things and use them on all sorts of stuff every day. Toms and guitar amps mostly. I also own a bunch of other stuff, and for bass amps my first choice is usually the RE20 or AT4033, but if somebody wants it I'll use a 57. Or a 58, or a Beta 52, or a D112, or whatever some guy brings with him. (I actually hate the Beta 52 more than anything but other people seem to like what it does to the sound. Not my band, dude gets what he wants.) Not a big deal.

I find 95% of the people I see just want to use the DI, many actually seem confused when offered a mic. If that's what they want they get that too.
 
While I have you bass player/sound men gathered here let me ask for some advice.
I play at church; contemporary praise & worship.
Roscoe LG2005 w/bart pups & bart 3 band preamp.
No Amp.
DI= Radial Tonebone Bassbone
Headphones for monitors.
Yamaha Digital Board
Veeerrry Mediocre sound men (well intentioned but no real experience or skill)
Boomy Room with a lot of flat surface. Seats approx 800 (including balcony)
Sound is excellent in my headphones but trouble cutting through the mix in the house.
1. Should I run the board EQ flat and control everything at the DI & Bass?
2. Change Gear setup?
3. Suggestions?
:help::help::help::help::help:

Thanks,
 
you should go out front and listen to it in the house with the soundman and decide from there. could be any number of factors and we wouldn't know. i would really be tempted to keep as much control over it by me as possible, though your best route is to talk to the soundman so you both solve the problem and he doesn't end up re-eqing it back to where it was.
 
While I have you bass player/sound men gathered here let me ask for some advice.
I play at church; contemporary praise & worship.
Roscoe LG2005 w/bart pups & bart 3 band preamp.
No Amp.
DI= Radial Tonebone Bassbone
Headphones for monitors.
Yamaha Digital Board
Veeerrry Mediocre sound men (well intentioned but no real experience or skill)
Boomy Room with a lot of flat surface. Seats approx 800 (including balcony)
Sound is excellent in my headphones but trouble cutting through the mix in the house.
1. Should I run the board EQ flat and control everything at the DI & Bass?
2. Change Gear setup?
3. Suggestions?
:help::help::help::help::help:

Thanks,
suggestions(may or may not help):
boomy room with balcony?
acoustic treatment will help the most.
yamaha digital desk... make sure the sound guy is using the high pass filter on everything, including the kick and bass guitar. (at appropriate frequencies... try maybe 40hz on the kick, somewhere between 50-80hz on the bass, everything else between 80hz all the way up to 160hz(use your ears for this!!).
play some program music with a lot of low end...
try using the parametric on the main buss with a tight q(bell curve), boost about 6 db (or more) and sweep until you find the mode(guilty frequency).
then cut that frequency and widen the bell curve (as needed)
to clear things up.
last, try the phase reverse switch, see which position sounds better.
nothing will entirely cure an acoustically crappy room though, except
treating the room.
good luck..
 
I would prefer an I-5 over a 57 in most applications, including any drums, vocals, and guitars, just for the duribility factor alone. You can run a fork lift over one. Having said that, I would prefer a 57 on bass (especailly 10's) over almost anything else as a constant. The 57 is more or less a standard for a simple multi-purpose mic. I use D6's, Beta52's, M88's, 421's, or (mostly) 57's on bass. The 57 works well for bass. It's hard to "F" that up. I haven't used a 58 for bass, but I imagine it would be pretty close.
I have used 58's for kick though. Surprisingly useful.