Yeah I saw this pic but it's hard to judge .. it looks like there's a centimeter in each direction between the bass and the interior shell, which would mean the bass would move around once inside 
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I used to have one of those cases. I rolled up a towel and would put it in the bottom of the case to fill up all the space.Yeah I saw this pic but it's hard to judge .. it looks like there's a centimeter in each direction between the bass and the interior shell, which would mean the bass would move around once inside![]()
Is the fit millimeter perfect ?
I would definitely like a hard case for mine.
That must have been a really hard hit!Does anyone find it odd that Dingwall still doesn't offer hardcases for their basses? I can't be the only one who has had his Dingwall damaged in shipping.
View attachment 3883855 View attachment 3883856
If I was a touring guy this is the direction I’d go for sure.I don't see them mentioned here much, but I've been using an ENKI case to hold both my D-Birds. It's a great way to move a couple basses around, and it's a super protective hard case! Further, it doubles as a convenient stage stand![]()
I’d have to guess it comes down to cost.I may have missed this but does anyone know why the D-Birds now have a “closed back” version of the Hipshot bridge, rather than the quick change version on all the other Canadian Dingwalls?
View attachment 3884558
Vs
View attachment 3884559
I’d have to guess it comes down to cost.
There is more machining involved in the Canadian option vs the new one.
The new bridge option gets a way from those crappy hipshot individual pieces that so many complain about and puts on what I ASSUME(I know I shouldn’t do that) is a less expensive option to manufacture a proprietary 1 piece bridge.
started with 2 pickups only but wanted to leave the 3x route so you could change positions.
Exactly.
Same cut away, 1 machine setting.
I believe you can just stick the ball end in there and it goes up in a slot. You don’t have the thread the string through any holes.
I like the new design, it’s cleaner looking.
This explanation would make sense, but the photo of the “closed” bridge D-Bird above is a Canadian Custom, not an import Standard. I’m still scratching my head!
View attachment 3884593
It is covered, just had to wait two weeks for one shipping company to not do their job only for another company to be brought in and finally do it and pick it up to have it sent back. It just blows my mind that instruments of this price are shipped this way.
That would be cool. I definitely like the aesthetic and the ergos would be much nicer.I believe you can just stick the ball end in there and it goes up in a slot. You don’t have the thread the string through any holes.
I like the new design, it’s cleaner looking.
I may have missed this but does anyone know why the D-Birds now have a “closed back” version of the Hipshot bridge, rather than the quick change version on all the other Canadian Dingwalls?
View attachment 3884558
Vs
View attachment 3884559
Well thought out, as always.The new bridge is a solution to a couple of problems. The radiused top of the D-Roc requires either solo-saddles or a deeper bridge that sits in a pocket with a flat bottom.
The Afterburner bridge was designed as a top mount bridge. It has open-ended saddle slots. If the bridge was lowered into a pocket it would expose the inside of the pocket wall at the end of the slots (not the end of the world but not very elegant). Also, the ballends need room to slide in and out of their pockets which creates another problem when dropping this bridge into a pocket. All this to say, the Afterburner bridge is not an ideal solution for a pocketed bridge on the D-Roc.
The new bridge was designed specifically to be pocket mounted. We figured out how to make it quick change by rethinking how the ball end is held. It's also designed to sit on a precision lasercut shim which opens up the range of action adjustment significantly by adding or removing the shim. We make the new bridges inhouse in small batches so currently they are only available on D-Roc Customs. Time will tell if they make it into other models.
The new bridge is a solution to a couple of problems. The radiused top of the D-Roc requires either solo-saddles or a deeper bridge that sits in a pocket with a flat bottom.
The Afterburner bridge was designed as a top mount bridge. It has open-ended saddle slots. If the bridge was lowered into a pocket it would expose the inside of the pocket wall at the end of the slots (not the end of the world but not very elegant). Also, the ballends need room to slide in and out of their pockets which creates another problem when dropping this bridge into a pocket. All this to say, the Afterburner bridge is not an ideal solution for a pocketed bridge on the D-Roc.
The new bridge was designed specifically to be pocket mounted. We figured out how to make it quick change by rethinking how the ball end is held. It's also designed to sit on a precision lasercut shim which opens up the range of action adjustment significantly by adding or removing the shim. We make the new bridges inhouse in small batches so currently they are only available on D-Roc Customs. Time will tell if they make it into other models.
In my road dog days I really loved my Steinberger XM2 w/it's fitted gig bag. I mean it was tailored to that bass. That thing was strapped on my back or sitting by my side anytime we traveled (and most of the time when we weren't LOL). For almost 10 years now any OHC I get with a bass goes in the shed. I have stands in the house and several MONO gig bags for all my basses.A good gigbag beats a good HS case in almost every situation. Ultimately a custom fit HS or roadcase is the best solution for protection. They are just not practical for everyday use and are pretty spendy.