• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do women mind being called girls?

Does it bother you?

  • Yes, I'm a woman and it does bother me

  • No, I'm a woman and it doesn't bother me

  • I'm a man & think it doesn't matter

  • I'm a man & women are women, not girls


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Spoken like a true member of the generation that gets offended over every little thing.

Pretty sure I'm older than you. But maybe I've had more opportunity in my life to realize the things I've done (unwittingly in most cases) to put others down. I also decided to change. It appears you have made a different choice.
 
So it's an insult, based on the concept of women being an inferior gender, and assigned as a nickname for female genitalia?

I'm more than a little surprised you've never heard the term woose used.
It also occurs to me that you knew what it meant & just wanted someone to explain it so you could get offended by it.
 
Last edited:
I'm aware I'm in the middle of an ongoing back-and-forth. I'm not joining in on any side apart from the one I'm on, which is that of language and our freedom to use it and recognise it as an evolving beast.
So it's an insult, based on the concept of women being an inferior gender
Or possibly evolving as a replacement for the concepts of reluctance and cowardice previously expressed by "Hir who hesitates is lost."
and assigned as a nickname for female genitalia?
Clearly it isn't. The term has at least two very distinct meanings and the meaning is very clear in this case. Your insistence on their being only one interpretation, the one that you dictate, makes the moral high ground achieved by it, merely a conjuring trick for those prepared to take things on face value.
 
Frankly because I don't see why I should tiptoe on eggshells around the sensitivities of minorities. The whole non-binary thing has been around for decades if not centuries and I was pretty non-binary myself in the early 70s/glam era, but I didn't expect people to change their language to suit me and nor did I bleat on about being offended all the time. The modern era is full of people who take themselves and their fragile egos way too seriously.

F*** everyone, I say :)

Ps if you disagree with me I will be offended and from now on I wish all to address me as "overlord" at all times.


Dear overlord :rolleyes:,

I've found that my life tends to run a little smoother when I simply call people what they want to be called. It takes negligible effort on my part, and yields good results.

Sincerely,

Snowflake :wacky:
 
I'm aware I'm in the middle of an ongoing back-and-forth. I'm not joining in on any side apart from the one I'm on, which is that of language and our freedom to use it and recognise it as an evolving beast.

Or possibly evolving as a replacement for the concepts of reluctance and cowardice previously expressed by "Hir who hesitates is lost."

Clearly it isn't. The term has at least two very distinct meanings and the meaning is very clear in this case. Your insistence on their being only one interpretation, the one that you dictate, makes the moral high ground achieved by it, merely a conjuring trick for those prepared to take things on face value.

Oh come on.
 
Just clarifying terms on this obvious troll/political thread.

There's nothing trolling or political about it, but as I suspected, you already knew what it meant.
THAT is what I call trolling, asking for the definition so you can get offended over it.

time for a break, at least for me
maybe you should think about it as well, before you get all worked up
 
Status
Not open for further replies.