TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have to disagree on your no function comment. On a P, I agree. Its right where my fingers want to be, so it's gotta go. On a Rick, it's a great rest for me when digging into bridge territory. I suppose we can just call it subjective. Totally functional to me in that case.To me this is a case of form following function. There is no appreciable functional merit to pickup or bridge covers. In fact, both are restrictive. Since I know what a nuisance they are from a playing perspective the visual produces and equally negative response.
I usually play just behind the pickup so I think I'll be OK. And yes the i love the look as wellI love the look of both pickup and bridge covers. Chrome, baby! It's beautiful, like a '55 Chrysler.
Unfortunately, I cut my teeth on a P-Bass with no covers, so I got used to anchoring my thumb on, and plucking right over, the pickups and palm muting at the bridge.
Pics?!I play a '75 and a '79 P-Bass with covers all the time and they don't bother me in the least. I don't even think about 'em.