Dont forget RW strings changed things a lot.It does still sound like a bass. Players are just exploring the limits of the instrument and finding that it is capable of being very versatile.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Dont forget RW strings changed things a lot.It does still sound like a bass. Players are just exploring the limits of the instrument and finding that it is capable of being very versatile.
Absolutely...im a diehard Gibson guy (im old) but its remarkable what Carol was able to achieve...without a doubt a P bass and a pick is still a benchmark and she played sitting down which myself learning trumpet early 70s i was taught to practice sitting down....we were told to play either a Getzen trumpet or an Olds Coronet as well.There were other basses sold/played in the '60s - hollow-bodies of a few different brands were very popular. (as in, players did have a choice) But a Fender bass was the bass of choice by the industry at large, and put an indelible stamp on a decade of some of the best music ever made/recorded. Paul McCartney is "know" by his Hofner bass even though he also played a Fender J, and a Ric to name two. So yes, I know she kept playing and played basses other than a P but all I was inferring was that the iconic Carol Kaye is know by her Fender P.
View attachment 5264795
Damn kids with their playing above the 5th fretmodernaires want a bass to sound like anything BUT a bass, vintage bass is becoming lost in the noise.
It's largely genre-specific IMO. I've been in LA for about 20 years now (and for a time occasionally moving around in some of the same circles as people like Hurley, JMJ, etc), and IME in the studio it was always about passive traditional-leaning basses. Not just P's though--look at the rack of instruments those cats bring to a session and it's P's, Hofners, Mustangs, Casadys, all manner of shorties and hollowbodys. But that's rock/pop/indie/singer-songwriter that as others have described has a "classic" or even "retro" bent to it. The instruments are like a cast of characters in a production, and those basses are right for the parts. Same with the guitar choices, or snare drums, or whatever. My understanding is it's pretty much the same in Nashville.There's that story of Sean Hurley moving to L.A. with a five-string active Lakland to become a session player just to realize it's a P-bass world out there. It wasn't always the case though. There was time when hi-fi or active basses were all the rage, like Warwicks, Ken Smiths, Alembics, Tobias, Zons, Spector etc.
...so that they can spend six hours on getting a good drum sound...Producers are familiar with P basses....i've read stories of bassists coming in with all kinds of basses but engineers need to get a working, pleasing sound quickly...
Yes, but with live drums, you're making a commitment to a sound(and performance) that is a lot harder to change after the fact, in the mix, etc. You can always re-track a bass guitar--easy peasy!...so that they can spend six hours on getting a good drum sound...
BTDT, so I really do speak from experience.![]()
IMHO.My point was that Sean Hurley is playing sessions in an environment where the people paying him are asking for a certain thing explicitly. In my experience, and I think in his, it’s a better move to play the bass they say they want than to convince them you can get the tone they asked you for from something else.Being active or passive for a bass doesn’t have much to do with the role one wants to give to the instrument in a musical context in my opinion.
Opel Kadett 1972.
what kind of car is that vintage one?
Bass is about as far away from having a prevailing taste consensus as it's possible to be.There's that story of Sean Hurley moving to L.A. with a five-string active Lakland to become a session player just to realize it's a P-bass world out there. It wasn't always the case though. There was time when hi-fi or active basses were all the rage, like Warwicks, Ken Smiths, Alembics, Tobias, Zons, Spector etc.
Do you think the scale will ever tip back towards hi-fi/active basses? If so, how do you think it'll happen?
My experience where I was asked to not play the Stingray was when I played with Stan Ridgway of Wall of Voodoo. He cannot stand the sound. Luckily I have a cheap Fernandez Jazz that saved the day. It was not only him that complained of how boomy it was, but he was the most vocal. It was my prettiest bass at that time. I finally sold that SR5 and did not get another one until a SR5 Special this year (18 years later). The Neo-Mags, and roasted neck and pre-amp is different.
Honestly even with all the StingRay love here, I still have lukewarm feelings for this one. I only really like the middle position and cut a tad from the TMB controls. It did work well in the one gig I did - but no better than my modded Squire Jazz V with EMG JAX5. Why they use 17.5mm spacing and not offer wider on a 5 is a head scratcher for me. It will be here just in case, but will not achieve primary status.
I do have a 6-stringer from Tune upgraded with Delanos and a Pope. Well - I always was underwhelmed by the Pope, but figured it out. There is a reason Fodera uses them