Anyone who was offended by Ken Smith's posts needs to grows a set of balls.
Seriously, are you guys kidding me? Ken's been in the buisness over 30+ years and his opinion, to me at least, means something of value, whether I agree with it or not. I've only been on TB about a year, and have had interaction with KS a bunch of times, and I never felt intimidated, offended, put off, or felt like crying to a good Meryl Streep movie while I drank warm tea and painted my toenails.
Whatever. Much better to get advice from a guy that has been playing for 6 months, owns a Chinese bass, and asks "how do you make a walking bassline?"
So on the one hand, deference should be shown to someone with multiple decades of experience...
musicman5string said:
I don't know Jake, whom you directed that at, but I'd like to remind you of these names:
Jimmy Blanton
Scott LaFaro
Both of whom pretty much are responsible for the evolution of Jazz Double Bass playing, who did so before their untimely deaths.....before the age of 26.
Just wanted to point that out Grandpa.
...and on the other, young pups under the age of 26 sometimes show that their voices are equally valuable if not moreso.
That's the dilemma we find ourselves in here with the notion of granting certain members an elevated status based on their long term contributions to the field rather than simply reacting to what is actually being said in each moment (as is the case with newbies). Our instincts say, "sure...X has been doing this for ### years, so I'm going to show deference to X because of this". As a player, I do this with guys like Paul Warburton and Lynn Seaton, and when in doubt, I give them the benefit of it. I might not always agree with everything they say or play, but I recognize their right to state their opinion or play (for example) something that I might not. In cases like this, there's no problem, and all is well.
The problem comes when that respect is assumed to be deserved from everyone in all cases, or worse, demanded when not accorded from the start. A newbie may well be a fool for disagreeing with a more experienced player or luthier, but it is their right to do so. As a player, I raised a lot of eyebrows for being largely self-taught when I first got here by people like Ed Fuqua, who basically called me out when I spoke about ways of playing and/or learning that often don't work for newbies. But rather than talk down to me, he reached out by saying, "You send me some of your stuff, and I'll send you some of my stuff, and then we can have a more informed discussion about what we're really talking about". Ditto for Sam Sherry. And once these exchanges had taken place, there was some give and take on both sides. Ed and Sam pointed out some things that I could work on while admitting that what I was doing seemed to be working for me in the big picture, and I replied in kind. And from what I can tell, everybody learned something.
I also have found Ken to be an excellent resource of information about really old and rare basses, especially those that may be of some historical importance. It's his thing, he's passionate about it, and we can all learn a lot from that. When the clashes would occur with other members, it was usually with a member who was trying to do something much more basic, like trying to upgrade their really crappy first bass to a halfway decent gigging bass for some usage more often than not designated as "not orchestral", or from a someone trying to do a DYI repair on their own low end instrument who understood that it was a learning tool; or from someone posting about their pride and joy new or first bass that cost less than $2500 or so. These people usually post for encouragement, and they should be able to do that...they should be able to post a thread about a Ford without having the spectre of a Rolls Royce raised as the gold standard against which they should judge their new pride and joy means of transportation. Sometimes a guy with a new Escort just wants to say, "just got my first car, and I'm digging the hell out of not having to take the bus every day...ain't she a beaut?" And if that's what this guy is saying, more power to him as far as I'm concerned.
All of which does not mean that I don't enjoy perusing the occasional eye candy thread about basses of historical significance, nor do I want to discourage anyone from posting in or adding to those kinds of threads. They are a great resource, and I don't want to discourage those kinds of threads in any way. Heck, Paul W has got to have something to hang in his bathroom, right?
There is a time and a place for both here at TB, and we have to allow for that, which demands respect from each side for the worth of the other. We may all aspire to drive a restored 'vette someday, or maybe even a classic Rolls. But most of us get to work to earn our daily bread in something far more pedestrian. They're both valuable, just maybe for different reasons.