• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Douglas Stingray copy

;)



You do a whole-step bend at the 12th how often?

If you do this commonly in performance, then I can see how it might be an issue, but if you're just doing it for argument's sake, then that's a pretty sketchy basis on which to say that polepiece alignment is an issue.

It's not the same bass, but the amount of movement required to attempt a whole-step bend popped the G-string out of the saddle on my Alembic, and I didn't even get the full bend, so I'm not sure how possible it is on other basses, but it's certainly difficult.

Whole step bends? Not that often. However, I am playing along with Steve Morse's Cruise Missile right now, and -- at least the way I learned it -- that requires me to bend a whole step at the 17th fret G-string. Hey I can live with the volume drop, I guess :) I only really mentioned this because you said that "no amount of bending (within [your] capabilities) could take [a string] out of the magnetic field enough to cause signal loss." Actually a half step anywhere high on the neck, g-string, causes a little volume drop for me. Again I am sitting here right now noodling with my Ray 4. YMMV.


edit: awaiting smart Dave LaRue comment regarding Steve Morse tunes, and EB basses... :)
 
Whole step bends? Not that often. However, I am playing along with Steve Morse's Cruise Missile right now, and -- at least the way I learned it -- that requires me to bend a whole step at the 17th fret G-string. Hey I can live with the volume drop, I guess :) I only really mentioned this because you said that "no amount of bending (within [your] capabilities) could take [a string] out of the magnetic field enough to cause signal loss." Actually a half step anywhere high on the neck, g-string, causes a little volume drop for me. Again I am sitting here right now noodling with my Ray 4. YMMV.


edit: awaiting smart Dave LaRue comment regarding Steve Morse tunes, and EB basses... :)

I'll take your word for it-given the amount of movement involved, I can see how it might happen. Since none of my basses have an MM pickup, I can't say for sure if this would happen for me, and it didn't happen when I owned a Bongo, but that's a different matter entirely, since we're discussing Stingrays.

YMMV, etc.

:)
 
Does that make me childish or am I simply exercising my choice?

No it doesn't make you childish. But you are not exercising your choice. You are exercising someone else's choice. Making a firm decision based on someone else's experience alone is not a good way to do things. It's one thing to use it as a starting point, but you should make up your own mind in the end.

Let me give you an example. I used to be on the "I think the EBMM Bongo is ugly bandwagon." I used to think they were hideously ugly and had plenty of support here for that idea. Then I went out and actually played one. I fell in love with it's tone, feel and playability. I no longer think they are ugly. In fact, I like that there aren't any other basses out there quite like them. I now own three of them and that's all I play.

I could have gone along with everyone else and had someone else's opinion as my own. But I decided to think for myself.
 
Jack, you may or may not be able to answer this question, but does EB buy a sample of these copies that repeatedly come out? I would if I were them if nothing else out of curiosity, but also for any potential days in court. A hall of shame with copies at the factory would be pretty funny too.
 
No it doesn't make you childish. But you are not exercising your choice. You are exercising someone else's choice. Making a firm decision based on someone else's experience alone is not a good way to do things. It's one thing to use it as a starting point, but you should make up your own mind in the end.

Let me give you an example. I used to be on the "I think the EBMM Bongo is ugly bandwagon." I used to think they were hideously ugly and had plenty of support here for that idea. Then I went out and actually played one. I fell in love with it's tone, feel and playability. I no longer think they are ugly. In fact, I like that there aren't any other basses out there quite like them. I now own three of them and that's all I play.

I could have gone along with everyone else and had someone else's opinion as my own. But I decided to think for myself.
I love this post and it's one of the hardest things to get through peoples heads; there is room for personal choice and there's no need to insult others over their unwillingness to give up that freedom of choice.

That last line is great. :)
 
Nope, can't be me. I would never subscribe to the idea that everything besides EBMM sucks. What kind of idiot would think one brand of bass fits everyone? I've been a rather big proponent of choice, actually.

And from here (dining room), I can see an F-bass, a Jazz bass, a Telecaster and a Strat, none of which were technically made by Ernie Ball.

But whoever he's talking about sounds like someone I'd like to know!
Bovine: I've been on the EB forum and you own like 7 or more EB basses. And here u are talking about Fbasses, Jazz basses. Just How many basses do you own, and finally, what do you do for a living are u in the Texas Oil Business? I can barely afford my brand new SR5 HH bass payments as it is.
 
OK, I know Kurt reads these forums but perhaps he needs/wants to be mum on this subject. What I've discovered, however, is that the pup in this thing appears to be identical to the GFS alnico I just purchased. I went to perform the swap and am unable to find any difference between the two. I performed the swap just in case I'm wrong, but I think not. Kurt, is this the case?

A quick run on the multimeter shows that they're identical as well. If this thing really has the GFS alnico then it's an even more amazing item for $89.

On a side note, after the swap I hooked this bass up to my main rig and discovered much of the tone I'd been missing previosuly on my practice amp. I eagerly await a new set of Ken Smith Bass Burners and the cloned Stingray preamp to extract that last ~20% of the tone I really desire.
 
OK, I know Kurt reads these forums but perhaps he needs/wants to be mum on this subject. What I've discovered, however, is that the pup in this thing appears to be identical to the GFS alnico I just purchased. I went to perform the swap and am unable to find any difference between the two. I performed the swap just in case I'm wrong, but I think not. Kurt, is this the case?

A quick run on the multimeter shows that they're identical as well. If this thing really has the GFS alnico then it's an even more amazing item for $89.

On a side note, after the swap I hooked this bass up to my main rig and discovered much of the tone I'd been missing previosuly on my practice amp. I eagerly await a new set of Ken Smith Bass Burners and the cloned Stingray preamp to extract that last ~20% of the tone I really desire.

You may be right, the pup seems to me to have a heck of a lot more grunt than I expected, when I changed the strings I got a big change it tonal quality! It has a pretty good sound for the money, it sounds slightly over driven, a nice punchy growl unlike any of my other Basses, I'm very pleased with it!:bassist:
 
You may be right, the pup seems to me to have a heck of a lot more grunt than I expected, when I changed the strings I got a big change it tonal quality! It has a pretty good sound for the money, it sounds slightly over driven, a nice punchy growl unlike any of my other Basses, I'm very pleased with it!:bassist:

Yah, the low-end balls on this thing was what my little combo amp was not revealing to me and the part that I really love/wanted.

I wanted to clarify what the tone knob is doing - it sounds to me like it's increasing/decreasing mids. Full countrclockwise gets relatively close to my old P-bass. Is it doing the same for others?