...and now I have to go the whole way and do the full body rout like Ibanez intended. Because, let's be honest, that really does look awesome.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
@ChickWithaRic
Are you seeing the Sawstop job site saws yet? I just saw one first time on a job site the other day, other than that it’s all the Dewalt with the rack and pinion fence, even for finish carpenters. If I had the $$$, I’d sell my Jet Contractor saw in a heartbeat and get Sawstop.
Speaking of Ric pups, I think they used the identical HB-1’s for bass and guitar. It’s all going into one output signal, can’t see why 4 of 6 poles would matter.?
Ouch. You learnt that lesson the hard way!It was stolen, along with all my other gear, and some of it was very nice, when I was in my early 20s, and I know who stole it. Never try to befriend smack heads.
Good choice. That’s going to look great....and now I have to go the whole way and do the full body rout like Ibanez intended. Because, let's be honest, that really does look awesome.
Good choice. That’s going to look great.
Yes, the Roadstar II was an outstanding instrument (actually a whole series of instruments). I’ll even go as far as to say just about everything Ibanez built from around 1976 to 1983 or maybe a little later (1986?) was as good as anything needs to be. Their quality was crazy good.
I’m not as down on Fender as you are and I’ve owned and still own some quite excellent instruments with that name on the headstock but I will give you this: I’ve also played some clunkers with that name on the headstock but I’ve never, ever, played a bad Ibanez from that time period. Come to think of it, that might apply to all instruments made in Japan at that time.
My first bass, which I bought from a friend in college, was a 1979 Ibanez Studio; an uncommon model that’s built like a tank and weighs about as much as one. My friend sold it to me for $100 (and was worried he was overcharging me) because he was saving up for another bass he was obsessed with: a pearl white Westone.I agree about Japanese instruments from that era. Like I said in a post about Westone basses but it applies more generally, I wish I’d bought a pickup bed full back when you couldn’t hardly give them away. Ah well…
By "full body", do you mean strung through the body, full route for the bridges, full body paint job?...and now I have to go the whole way and do the full body rout like Ibanez intended. Because, let's be honest, that really does look awesome.
I still remember his reasoning for charging so little for it: “It isn’t shiny or anything.”
Those tuners!Here's my Roadstar ll:
![]()

I'll rout the bridges 1/8 or so into the body, like on the Ibanez EDB900.By "full body", do you mean strung through the body, full route for the bridges, full body paint job?
Good choice. That’s going to look great.
Yes, the Roadstar II was an outstanding instrument (actually a whole series of instruments). I’ll even go as far as to say just about everything Ibanez built from around 1976 to 1983 or maybe a little later (1986?) was as good as anything needs to be. Their quality was crazy good.
I’m not as down on Fender as you are and I’ve owned and still own some quite excellent instruments with that name on the headstock but I will give you this: I’ve also played some clunkers with that name on the headstock but I’ve never, ever, played a bad Ibanez from that time period. Come to think of it, that might apply to all instruments made in Japan at that time.
While I think Ibby still offers excellent instruments at every price point, I lost interest in Ibanez’ product line when they started making their necks thinner and thinner. In fact, as a player with fairly big mitts, the BTBs have been the only recent(ish) basses of theirs that seemed interesting to me, although I’m not really jonesing for one. I would probably enjoy playing an aircraft carrier.I wasn't so happy with the BTB…. …on reflection it was a poor choice for me. That huge slab body and 35 inch scale weren't really ideal for a player on the petite side. I felt like I was playing an aircraft carrier.
Ah, got it.I'll rout the bridges 1/8 or so into the body, like on the Ibanez EDB900.
Nah, I just don't like small speakers, and that was positively petite compared to my old horn system.You must have some f***ing big books.
Makes me think of my Grandfather who was a wrench on aircraft during WWII in the Pacific (RAAF motto). Beaufighters were his love.Per ardua, ad astra
Agreed. I have a RB620...My previous Ibanez was a Roadstar II, which I think is the greatest P bass that 7ender didn't make
...with a replaced G tuner and I'm tempted to put the chrome Gotoh bridge I found recently and a set of GB707s on it. I'm not muck of a 7ender or P fan, but for what I paid for it, there's no point in selling it. Not mine but it looks like this.I dropped a Gotoh bridge on it, Schaller tuners, and a DiMarzio, but it didn't really need any of them. It was good to go right out of the box.
Been there too, and whilst I was angry about it for a long time, life circumstance have given me a different perspective as I got older; there but for the Grace of God go I.It was stolen, along with all my other gear, and some of it was very nice, when I was in my early 20s, and I know who stole it. Never try to befriend smack heads.
I used to call mine the Nimitz when I got it but grew into it and now it's my fave, but it's a Volo and 33". I still lust after the BTB1826 though and if I got one, I think I'd damn well make it work in my hands. I think it's about the prettiest bass I've ever seen.That huge slab body and 35 inch scale weren't really ideal for a player on the petite side. I felt like I was playing an aircraft carrier.
Agreed. I have a RB620...
...with a replaced G tuner and I'm tempted to put the chrome Gotoh bridge I found recently and a set of GB707s on it. I'm not muck of a 7ender or P fan, but for what I paid for it, there's no point in selling it. Not mine but it looks like this.
View attachment 4474280
Nice. My first bass was a very similar Blazer, but instead of the ash/maple it was a tobacco burst and I'm not sure what the body was*. I bought it new in 83, but it must have been an 82 as apparently production stopped then.Mine was a 630.
I just assumed they were reasonably common. I prefer this headstock over the 4IL by a large margin.We didn't see many 620s, with the Artist series style 2+2 headstock.
These arrived today. I don't think they're a copy of anything, they're just Chinesium but they look solid enough and I'll be able to get the odd Ric string spacing with them.
View attachment 4461416
They're kind of, I suppose "interesting" is the word I'm looking for. They won't do top loading, they are string through body only.
They get even more interesting when you turn them over.
View attachment 4461428
I think that somebody has successfully identified a problem that doesn't exist, and solved it. I get the idea that there's a string guide guide there, and a lug at the tail end to prevent rotation, but are either of those actually problem areas? I've been feeding strings through bodies for years and have never not managed to find the bridge with the pointy end, and I've never had a monorail rotate on me, mostly because they are held down with at least two screws which is a pretty effective anti rotation mechanism. But great work, whoever did this. Really, great work.
This means that to fit each rail, you have to drill two very accurately positioned holes, and rout a 1/2" x 3/8" slot into the body in exactly the right spot. I might be missing a concept here. Perhaps you're supposed to rout huge long slots and slide the rails around in them to set the intonation, presumably ignoring the million screwholes from setting up for previous gauges of strings as time passes. Speaking of intonation, there's a whole 5/16" of fore - aft saddle movement, which kind of forces you into a staggered arrangement and means you have very little room for error in placement.
As if the fact that you need to carry out 12 very precise machining operations to install the set wasn't enough to deal with.
Or I dunno, maybe the designer just liked boats, and made it kinda look like a boat. But when you install it, it's going to be a capsized boat. This whole device seems almost like the product of a mind at the borderline of sociopathy.
View attachment 4461439
I'm feeling whelmed. Not under or over whelmed, just baseline whelmed. And of course, these parts are so downright weird, over designed, and anarchic, that they are just crying out to be used on a Ric inspired bass, so of course I'm going to use them.
So that worked out pretty well, I'd say.