JAUQO III-X
Inactive
THAT is cool! So, it appears they had this discussion way back when and went with it without all the arguing we do today?
Yes
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
THAT is cool! So, it appears they had this discussion way back when and went with it without all the arguing we do today?
Well, the thread did *not* start out with any statement about genre, just tuning - but it was clearly implied that this was going to be yet another "I'm a metal guy that folks look down on! Why??? WHY!?!?!?" - - which seems just plain silly to me. If you like to pay "metal", then good for you - why would you possibly care what anyone else thinks of how you tune your bass?
I don't know why so many "metal" folks are so insecure. I have suspicions, but they are just that and nothing more.
Long before metal or this particular little Holy War about drop tuning came along, there was this:
Ron Carter was using one in the 1960s. So were Richard Davis and others. You can set these up with multiple stops, not just E as pictured, for quick change to any drop tuning you want.
EDIT: ...and the classical players were using them long before the 60s.![]()
This is only my second metal band... I mostly played in indie/punk, ska, and cover bands back in the day. Metal has just come lately & fwiw, it's super fun.
Regardless... The answer to the OP's question is still "because the jazz guys say so."
THAT is cool! So, it appears they had this discussion way back when and went with it without all the arguing we do today?
THAT is cool! So, it appears they had this discussion way back when and went with it without all the arguing we do today?
THAT is cool! So, it appears they had this discussion way back when and went with it without all the arguing we do today?
Well, one always needs to remember that the upright bass was pretty far from a "standard" instrument early in its existence.
Lots of pre-20th century double basses were three stringed as opposed to four, and were tuned in fifths... or fourths...
Oh, and there were a number of 5/6 string upright basses also.
...and the different types of physical construction - Gamba corners, Violin corners, French, Busetto, arched back, flat back...
The double bass had been around at least 200 years when the C extension came along,
so I'd guess it was a pretty standard instrument by then.
Ummm... the current standard double bass hasn't even been around 200 years as of today.
The current style of 4 strings tuned in fourths became standard in the 1850s.
Some of the most famous "old" basses around were originally three strings that were converted to four. For example - the Gary Karr/Serge Koussevitsky Amati.
Salo basses, Amati basses, Testore basses...
Dragonetti playing a 3 string:
![]()
Nope, not really. In fact, it STILL isn't all that standard.
Solo vs. orchestral tuning. 4/5 string models. Violin vs. Gamba vs. French vs. Busetto corners. Arch vs. flat back. Non-standard sizing (even non standard SCALE length), etc.
So, drop-tuning is a misnomer. It is just an Alternate Tuning.
I just think it's funny that anyone would worry about what I, or anyone else, thinks about how they tune. Silly silly silly.
I just think it's funny that anyone would worry about what I, or anyone else, thinks about how they tune. Silly silly silly.

But the examples of classical guitar are not all that common. With the current drop tuning craze, you have whole bands that do it routinely, and all the time!
The original point of this thread was to ask why is this practice looked down on.
And I remember a few years back, some other thread where some people were talking about what their bands tune in, and they were saying stuff like C#, Aflat, d#, G flat (I am exaggerating, of course)....what they were saying made no sense, and I was just wondering why they would do such a thing.
I think the low tuning stuff is fine...and I totally get it. It creates a different mood, different texture, but using the weird intervals in your tuning is just, well, weird....and to me, it seems like cheating to make certain riffs or chords easier to play.
Someone asked me if I only like and respect challenging or technically advanced music...no....but I think as a musician, there should be a certain amount of "job knowledge", and I feel it should be within normal parameters.
There is a difference between a good singer songwriter, and one not so good, for example...and that difference sometimes means one is cheating by using a capo all the time. Let's face it, it means they can learn 4 chords and play in any key on their guitar. And like using "auto tune", it''s cheating.