• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Drummer has joined a second band...

A bit of a tangent, but I think The Manchester Band would actually be a rad band name.

Not a bad idea... Manchester is NH's nearest excuse for a city, where most of the nightlife is. Locals call it "Manchvegas." In fact, there's actually a club in town named "Manchvegas."
 
I don't disagree with either of you there, but the I think the guitarist might have come to his senses a little more if the drummer had spoken to him about it first. As I say, they're good friends...he's secretly gone and joined this band.

The guitarist has been dragging his feet for a solid year - and that's somebody else's fault ???
 
Good for him, absolutely.

You don't own him, and you don't own his time. If he is still able to continue doing what he was doing for your band, what he does with his own time is none of your business. He can sit home watching youtube videos, get a side job waiting tables, run around with strippers, or join another band. It's his time and his life.

If he's failing to keep up with your band's schedule and activity, not learning songs or skipping rehearsals or never available for a gig, then replace him.

There was one point, years ago, when I had two projects going, one in Exeter and one in Manchester (NH, not the UK ones). It never particularly came up to talk to members of either project about the other as both were in preliminary phases and, as it happened, neither went anywhere. So I'm in a guitar shop with my wife one time and run into a guitarist, and introduce him as "the guitarist from the Manchester band."

He glares at me like I just spat on his mother and says, "THE band. I'm the guitarist in THE band."

Like I said, the band I was in with him never went anywhere, and I feel no remorse at all about being involved in another.

All a band really is, is a group of people making music together. It isn't a marriage, it isn't even dating. Just making music. Make music with whomever you can, whenever you can.

Funny how those with the least to offer in return tend to make the greatest demands for “commitment,” and hold the highest expectations of “loyalty” as they define ‘commitment’ and ‘loyalty.’ Which usually means: stand around ME and pay court while awaiting your instructions.
 
Two follow-up thoughts, BTW - I said if he's not keeping up, then replace him. If your project doesn't have enough to offer that you can't attract a replacement for him, then that should tell you something.

Also, what I've found over the last decade (just got my prize for ten years of TB membership!) is that it's WAY better to think of yourself as belonging to a community of musicians than as being a member of a band. I've probably gotten to the point where I have maybe a dozen or fifteen musical friends with four or five projects between them, at least, that we can throw together something ad hoc or sub in and out of each other's bands. Way less jealousy, way more productivity.

I leave a bass cabinet at each of a couple of friends' houses where I rehearse regularly in ongoing projects, so I only have to haul a head. Had a rehearsal last night at one and there was a power amp I didn't recognize plugged into it. My friend (a drummer) had a jam group going with some other friends and they used the cab, he hoped I didn't mind. I didn't (would have been nice if he had asked beforehand, but whatever), as long as the other guy doesn't mind me plugging into his head. No biggie. Mix and match.
 
We're a three piece originals grunge band trying to make our way locally. Turns out, the drummer got fed up of waiting for us to progress and has joined a second band, a rock cover band.

My initial response was, good for you. I've also been very fed up with this band because we have to rely on someone who is completely unreliable, but he is the source of all music (guitarist, vocalist, song writer). He's finally had the kick up the arse he's needed to finish the vocals on our EP - one year later - which is good news.

We're meeting up at the pub tonight to discuss how/if we're going to proceed. He's now signed up for a rehearsal every Wednesday with the cover band and has 15 gigs booked apparently. The guitarist and I are on the same side now, we don't think he should have joined the cover band. The worst bit is they've been friends for years, and the drummer didn't even discuss the possibility with the guitarist.

Apologies for the rant, it's just a PITA situation probably without a resolution! I'm expecting the drummer to either quit tonight, or we might have to ask him to leave. Whether he'll leave gracefully or be a dick about it I don't know, but I'm expecting the latter. I'm expecting him to claim ownership of the songs and say we shouldn't play them, record them etc.

My suggestion is that give him a chance, see how many practices he makes after this, see how his gigs cause us problems etc. We'll see!

You weren't playing. Simple. He found some folks who want to play. You guys can both commiserate over a beer but don't lose sight of the fact that he is now in a band and you guys are deciding if you want to be mad at him for it.
Shake his hand, apologize for draggin' feet and part as friends. You may meet each other again musically.
Get your tunes together, find someone to complete your band and go out and PLAY. :)

Good luck to you.
 
I have maybe a dozen or fifteen musical friends with four or five projects between them, at least, that we can throw together something ad hoc or sub in and out of each other's bands. Way less jealousy, way more productivity.

Also a lot more of a cookie cutter “get out de produckt” mindset that leads to the generic sound a lot of the local music scene seems to have gotten comfortable with. Reminds me of the Dallas Cowboys back in the 80s or thereabouts when their main play strategy was to just gain at least 5 yards on each play and get that first down. Just grind out the yardage. Nothing fancy.

It was a smart strategy. Solid professional football that won them a ton of games. It was also boring as all hell to watch. Some sportscasters rather appropriately dubbed it “assembly line” and “formula” football.

Eventually many fans started losing interest and shifted over to the then razzle-dazzle of college football for awhile and viewership and attendance dropped off. (Gee, does that sound at all familiar?)

Also, what I've found over the last decade (just got my prize for ten years of TB membership!) is that it's WAY better to think of yourself as belonging to a community of musicians than as being a member of a band.

Probably why there aren’t many of what I’d consider actual bands anymore on the local level. It’s more like being interchangeable cogs in ad hoc ensembles. Which is what I guess we’ve allowed ourselves to become - as proven by the pay (if any) our supposed “bands” are getting paid most places today.

Reminds me (other than the oay) what my brief union days were like. You get a call and “sheet” that says what, where, and when, if there’s rehearsal(s), what to wear, which bass to play, and what the pay is - and off you go, charts (if needed) to be provided. Otherwise bring your book.

It was good solid professional music, made to order and served up on demand, price guaranteed.

It paid well enough even if me, being new, only got somewhat regular work. But I found it all very unsatisfying after a very short time. I’m not knocking it. But it really wasn’t me. So I got out after less than two years.

Again not knocking it. It’s work. If that works for you, go for it. :thumbsup:
 
Lucky you! Your drummer will be improving and networking, something everyone should be doing if they're serious, or even slightly passionate, about music, at ALL levels.

I couldn't stand to be in a band with people who only play the same 8-12 songs for years at a stretch. If the band is so busy that there's no other real options, like gigging 300 nights per year, then that's another story. Your band has quite the opposite problem, and playing grunge is a sleepwalk so how much time or rehearsal could that possibly take?

Congratulate him, go to some of his gigs, and find your own other projects to join ... maybe even a main band that's actually active.

Best of luck!
 
Tough choice, Play with a cover band that is regularly gigging, or wait around for an original band that will not likely get a touring a contract, and whose friends and family will come down for their first gig and then likely not get regular gigs after that for lack of support. But yes creating bass lines for original tunes is fun and maybe the band will find a following... Just thinking out loud.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoonose
Also a lot more of a cookie cutter “get out de produckt” mindset that leads to the generic sound a lot of the local music scene seems to have gotten comfortable with. ...
Again not knocking it. It’s work. If that works for you, go for it.
I hear what you're saying, but it's not like there's nothing between that and endless procrastination...

I can't (can but won't...) speculate on WHY it takes a 3-piece grunge band a YEAR to record an EP's worth of vocals.
( OK - you twisted my arm. Fear of failure? Fear of success? Realization that the 'passion' everyone professed actually fizzled out 9 months ago? )
Is the music even relevant any more?
A band that isn't progressing musically, isn't actively recording, isn't playing out isn't (IMHO) a band; it's at best a social gathering.
It was posited that EVERYTHING hinges on the EP - which somehow never materialises.
I still don't understand that.
 
A band that isn't progressing musically, isn't actively recording, isn't playing out isn't (IMHO) a band; it's at best a social gathering.
It was posited that EVERYTHING hinges on the EP - which somehow never materialises.
I still don't understand that.

Agree 100%. If nothing is happening then nothing is happening. It’s already over. You just haven’t admitted it to yourself. And pinning everything else you do on a single arbitrary precondition (like cutting an EP) shows a lack of flexibility that will severely minimize your chances for success.

I guess I don’t really get “the hang.” When I get together with fellow musicians, I want to do some work and get down to it. I’ve already got plenty of civilian friends if I just want to socialize.

I also don’t get not performing.

Music is (IMO) primarily a performance art. And quite unusually, it’s an art form that has no physical form. It exists only in time. Vibrations propagating through the air over a period of time. Nothing to see or touch. Just a sensation to experience.

So if not to play it, why bother - unless you enjoy just reading and analyzing scores?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Whitfield
We're a three piece originals grunge band trying to make our way locally. Turns out, the drummer got fed up of waiting for us to progress and has joined a second band, a rock cover band.

My initial response was, good for you. I've also been very fed up with this band because we have to rely on someone who is completely unreliable, but he is the source of all music (guitarist, vocalist, song writer). He's finally had the kick up the arse he's needed to finish the vocals on our EP - one year later - which is good news.

We're meeting up at the pub tonight to discuss how/if we're going to proceed. He's now signed up for a rehearsal every Wednesday with the cover band and has 15 gigs booked apparently. The guitarist and I are on the same side now, we don't think he should have joined the cover band. The worst bit is they've been friends for years, and the drummer didn't even discuss the possibility with the guitarist.

Apologies for the rant, it's just a PITA situation probably without a resolution! I'm expecting the drummer to either quit tonight, or we might have to ask him to leave. Whether he'll leave gracefully or be a dick about it I don't know, but I'm expecting the latter. I'm expecting him to claim ownership of the songs and say we shouldn't play them, record them etc.

My suggestion is that give him a chance, see how many practices he makes after this, see how his gigs cause us problems etc. We'll see!

Why shouldn't the drummer have taken another gig? What is your project offering that is better than walking into a full calendar of paying gigs?
 
I don't disagree with either of you there, but the I think the guitarist might have come to his senses a little more if the drummer had spoken to him about it first. As I say, they're good friends...he's secretly gone and joined this band.

We don't think he'll have enough time to contribute to our band any more. I understand his reasons and they make good sense, but he's sort of killing one band that's his passion project to play for another.
I think you assume too much.
 
Also a lot more of a cookie cutter “get out de produckt” mindset that leads to the generic sound a lot of the local music scene seems to have gotten comfortable with. Reminds me of the Dallas Cowboys back in the 80s or thereabouts when their main play strategy was to just gain at least 5 yards on each play and get that first down. Just grind out the yardage. Nothing fancy.

It was a smart strategy. Solid professional football that won them a ton of games. It was also boring as all hell to watch. Some sportscasters rather appropriately dubbed it “assembly line” and “formula” football.

Eventually many fans started losing interest and shifted over to the then razzle-dazzle of college football for awhile and viewership and attendance dropped off. (Gee, does that sound at all familiar?)



Probably why there aren’t many of what I’d consider actual bands anymore on the local level. It’s more like being interchangeable cogs in ad hoc ensembles. Which is what I guess we’ve allowed ourselves to become - as proven by the pay (if any) our supposed “bands” are getting paid most places today.

Reminds me (other than the oay) what my brief union days were like. You get a call and “sheet” that says what, where, and when, if there’s rehearsal(s), what to wear, which bass to play, and what the pay is - and off you go, charts (if needed) to be provided. Otherwise bring your book.

It was good solid professional music, made to order and served up on demand, price guaranteed.

It paid well enough even if me, being new, only got somewhat regular work. But I found it all very unsatisfying after a very short time. I’m not knocking it. But it really wasn’t me. So I got out after less than two years.

Again not knocking it. It’s work. If that works for you, go for it. :thumbsup:
I will quibble a bit with this. Back in the day, it was possible for one band to keep its members busy 4 to 5 nights a week. Today, if you want to get decent stage time, there's no alternative for most of us but to network with other musicians and find as many projects as you are compatible with.

I play in four different projects right now. My main band is an originals/covers combo that can hold down three sets of mostly high energy music and keep a crowd on its feet. The same members, sans the singer, also back up a songwriter who does country-influenced indie pop originals with a few covers tossed in. Then I'm principal hired gun at the moment for a blues band. And I just booked monthly shows with a folksy artist who writes his own stuff and covers things like Dylan and Neil Young.

None of these four projects is remotely like the others; there's nothing cookie cutter about any of it. But they all keep me busier collectively than I would be otherwise, yet I am still not anywhere close to as busy as I was in 1985, with ONE band.
 
The drummer is the only one making any sense in this instance. There’s no rule that says you can only play in one band at a time, especially if the one band is not progressing.
Most of the musicians I know play in two, maybe three bands. Heck, even guys like Jack White have more than one thing going at a time.

Gone are the days when one dedicated themselves to one project.
 
Also a lot more of a cookie cutter “get out de produckt” mindset that leads to the generic sound a lot of the local music scene seems to have gotten comfortable with. Reminds me of the Dallas Cowboys back in the 80s or thereabouts when their main play strategy was to just gain at least 5 yards on each play and get that first down. Just grind out the yardage. Nothing fancy.

It was a smart strategy. Solid professional football that won them a ton of games. It was also boring as all hell to watch. Some sportscasters rather appropriately dubbed it “assembly line” and “formula” football.

Eventually many fans started losing interest and shifted over to the then razzle-dazzle of college football for awhile and viewership and attendance dropped off. (Gee, does that sound at all familiar?)



Probably why there aren’t many of what I’d consider actual bands anymore on the local level. It’s more like being interchangeable cogs in ad hoc ensembles. Which is what I guess we’ve allowed ourselves to become - as proven by the pay (if any) our supposed “bands” are getting paid most places today.

Reminds me (other than the oay) what my brief union days were like. You get a call and “sheet” that says what, where, and when, if there’s rehearsal(s), what to wear, which bass to play, and what the pay is - and off you go, charts (if needed) to be provided. Otherwise bring your book.

It was good solid professional music, made to order and served up on demand, price guaranteed.

It paid well enough even if me, being new, only got somewhat regular work. But I found it all very unsatisfying after a very short time. I’m not knocking it. But it really wasn’t me. So I got out after less than two years.

Again not knocking it. It’s work. If that works for you, go for it. :thumbsup:

That comes across awfully judgmental for "not knocking it," and there's a whole lot of assumptions there about what we play and what the music scene is like.







Three separate projects with overlapping membership (including me, obviously). So if the crew of musicians I move among are "cookie cutter," OK, fine.