• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Dua Lipa "Levitating" infringement lawsuit

That was the sense I got. Similar enough that a reasonable person would think, "Ha, I get it, that's cool," while someone else, perhaps looking for some quick cash, would hear an opportunity.

From what I remember, there was no mention of infringement with Blurred Lines until Robin Thicke and Pharrell said publicly that they were trying to create a track with that same vibe. Would there have been a lawsuit if they’d never discussed it publicly? I don’t know, but it might have been tougher to prove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
And you can't assume Dua Lipa or one of her producers heard that song unless you are arguing that everyone hears every song simply because it is available on the internet. Have you heard every song? No? Then how would she?
I’m not assuming her or her people heard it at all. I’m saying that you can’t say they didn’t hear it.

I do “get” what you’re saying, I’m simply saying that it’s plausible that someone connected to the defendant actually DID hear the song, and regardless of whatever the band in Florida may be, if their work was wrongfully used, they should be compensated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killing Floor
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSkKwBVzzsB6ugeZR6gRZpSyeuvNgfWRuy9ug&usqp=CAU.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vinny_G
You see that's the problem with these 3 chord tunes - everything basically sounds the same. I'm amazed there aren't more lawsuits on the table honestly.

Even if I assume that the producer never heard that reggae song, it is like walking a minefield - there's not much going on in the song anyways - simple beat, bass line follows the kick with a 8th note as a filler in between, and the rest is mostly vocals, harmony is basic I V IV degree-wise. It is very easy to produce a 3 chord song and find a predecessor that sounds very similar. Adam Neely once argued you can't own harmony... And I would agree with that - and the melody ostinato is different. Not much, but enough I guess. It sounds exactly the same to the average ear though I wouldn't be surprised if they somehow pull it off at the court. Like, what are you going to sue them for? Harmony? No. Beat? It's a simple 1&3 kick 2&4 snare... Melody? It's different. Articulation? Yeah right. Timbre? Not the same.

This above is the main reason why producers of pop music continually manage to pull it off by stamping generic pop hits by borrowing pieces of previously successful music on billboard and manipulate it just to the point where it cannot be legally considered a straight plagiate - even though it basically sounds the same.
 
Last edited:
I think part of the problem is the lack of melody in these songs — to my ear neither moves much at all. The primary musical feature of the vocal line is rhythmic, and the rhythm pattern is constrained by English prosody.

i am suspicious though that the old school “melody +lyrics “ criterion has gone away with the Blurred Lines case, and that all the lawyers will need to do is show that you can do a clean mashup of one into the other to convince the jury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow