Cool. Gary’s 1972 jazz bass neck is from 1972. What does that have to do with a 1975 neck?
The same options were available in 1968, 72, and 75 (and other years) aesthetically. You claimed "Impossible: They didn’t use black blocks in 1975".
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Cool. Gary’s 1972 jazz bass neck is from 1972. What does that have to do with a 1975 neck?
Here's the logo that was on my 1965 Jazz Bass. Picture is from late 1971 while I was touring with it. Very hard to see from this shot which I took out of a pic of me playing it, but it had the patent numbers under the Fender logo; is smaller than the one on the '68; and starts farther up the headstock. The style of writing is similar but it's an outlined logo as opposed to filled in with black. That's the head of my Standel amp behind it.So the Fender CS unveiled some gorgeous new models for this past holiday season; one of which is a “Journeyman relic 1968 jazz bass”. Relic’ed nitro body, quartersawn neck, blocks and bound…. You know the works.
It’s all great, but the Fender Custom Shop chose to use a decal from the late 70’s/early 80’s era, instead of the “period correct” late ‘60’s/mid 70’s decal. All this historic Fender mojo for well over $4,000!!
View attachment 4929197
View attachment 4929199
Fender Custom Shop 1968 Jazz Bass Journeyman Relic Vintage White #CZ564685
talk about a missed detail!
As far as I know, the maple necks with black blocks were not in regular production in 1975… perhaps “impossible” is too strong of word.The same options were available in 1968, 72, and 75 (and other years) aesthetically. You claimed "Impossible: They didn’t use black blocks in 1975".
Funny enough — the bass pictured on their website does in fact sport a period-correct (albeit “transitional”) logo for 1968:
View attachment 4929872













And what about possible neck dive ??? Oh my gosh !!!Considering the font of the '70s decal is heavier, bolder than that of the '68-correct font I'm concerned about weight.
And what about possible neck dive ??? Oh my gosh !!!![]()




That's what I was thinking. This is a replica of a Jazz with a warped and replaced neck.What if it's a '68 body with a '75 neck? Has that ever happened?
I remember when the first '62s came out and thought that was odd.First they put stacked knobs on '62s and now this S*#t.
Down by the river.Is the decal too close to the edge?
Where have all the flowers gone?When will they ever learn?
There is no reason to have that expectation given Fender's history.You’re point is spot on, however for $4,500 I’d expect a 1968 re-issued jazz bass by the vaunted Fender Custom shop to at least have the correct logo.
Fender. There’s occasional consistency at least.Impossible: They didn’t use black blocks in 1975… (please don’t bring up the “1975” reissue jazz bass they did in the mid-2000’s that had black blocks, 1978 logo, and 3 bolt-neck plate!! Ha, ha….)
Let's be reasonable. A "journeyman" who got a '68 Jazz Bass probably ruined the original neck by yanking out the frets with a weedwhacker and putting in a brass nut. Totally trashed at this point, he had to get a new one. The only one available was a mid '70's three bolt model which got hastily redrilled (crooked) and slapped on. This IS the perfect "Journeyman" bass.
A "journeyman" is the guy who everybody knows, but nobody wants to work with "since the last time".