I have learned some theory, but stuff like this just puts me off learning any further.
I gotcha. There is a point when it's just silly, and I agree we are that point right here.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have learned some theory, but stuff like this just puts me off learning any further.
Sadly, yes. I'd like to get back to your situation, though. What are your thoughts about my post #115?Wow. I inadvertently created one of those threads.
Sadly, yes. I'd like to get back to your situation, though. What are your thoughts about my post #115?
It sounds like the guitarist messed-up. True that E# exists, though you have to go a long long way to find the word used, particularly in a standard band rock band.
It is possible the guitarist honestly thought the scale is E, E#, F. I played with a (seemingly) good guitarist the other day. I said that a particular song was in A and he said "Which fret is that?".
The impossible happens.
Good thing there's no charge because otherwise you would be selling a bill of goods. E# is not F. There is no "F" in the key of F# Major. There is no E# in the key of F.
...
It would be akin to saying 4,000 grams instead of 4 Kilograms. Or 32 ounces instead of 2 pounds. It's technically the same thing, but an inefficient means of conveying it unless you have to do it that way....
I wonder how many of those arguing that E# is not correct under certain circumstances will be able to swallow a bit of pride and learn something before the thread gets closed. My prediction - nil.
Thank you. So now we know, after 7 pages of arguments about whether he might have correct in insisting that the note he wanted was "E#", that in fact he almost certainly wasn't.You are spot on. He has 20+ years of playing experience, but no actual "theory" experience. I think he was trying to get me to bend the note, not ridicule me. He just wanted to me to "play the right note" as you said. Thanks!
Uh, just for the record, this makes no sense, since no one would know what you intended to be playing and the note is the same physically in a tempered system. The only place the distinction is necessary is in communication about music, not the playing of it. As many have correctly noted, E# is not only legitimate, but correct in certain keys, notwithstanding that it is the equivalent/same note as F. Therefore, it would disrupt the theoretical (and yes, certainly annoying, especially in certain styles of music) context to notate it as an F in those keys.
However, what makes the most sense, and is the most annoying, is for anyone to give two poops or argue about it in the context of learning a non-classical tune in a regular old band. Some theory has its place in this context for sure, but this is stupid (plus as many have noted, this guy was wrong anyway - sharp means a half step, which is the note on the first fret of your E string (hehehe) no matter whatchoo call it)....
That's really not a good example. How you express 4,000 grams vs 4 kilograms carries additional meaning and speaks to the precision with which the mass was measured...but I digress.
This type of theory snobbishness is exactly what turns musicians, (some of whom are quite talented) against LEARNING.
I play with a guy who has been shredding for years and doesnt know the names of the chords. He can play though.
I took an online course of Music Theory with University of Edinburgh & it was great, but I got to the part about Modulation & raised my tone deaf ears in the air in surrender.
In practical use, it's absolutely stupid to say "E#" instead of "F". It would be akin to saying 4,000 grams instead of 4 Kilograms. Or 32 ounces instead of 2 pounds. It's technically the same thing, but an inefficient means of conveying it unless you have to do it that way.

